Support VWWC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Significant rear camber - are the rear springs sagged?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5
    Users Country Flag

    Significant rear camber - are the rear springs sagged?

    I have a MKIV 2004 2.0 Golf with the rear beam suspension. As far as I can tell the car is stock standard (not lowered) however the rear has noticeable camber and is scrubbing the inside of the tyres.

    I checked to see if the stub axle has been shimmed (no) and the springs look like the originals.

    I'm thinking the rear springs are sagged and that has caused the camber.

    Has anyone experienced this on the rear beam suspension?

    Thanks

    Trash Hauler

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    804
    Users Country Flag
    What psi do you keep your tyres at and do you rotate them every 10k kms?

    Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirocco20348 View Post
    What psi do you keep your tyres at and do you rotate them every 10k kms?

    Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
    Tyre pressures are 28 PSI

    The car has 139500 kms and i have had it for 2000 kms so have no idea how long since they have been rotated but doesn't look like they have ever been rotated
    BMW 330i M Sport 2006
    Golf MKIV 2.0 Lt 2004

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    804
    Users Country Flag
    28psi is way too low. They are under inflated and hence the noticible wear on the inside. VW says 28psi is recommended, but it's purely for comfort purposes. I would pump the tyres upto 34psi at a minimum.

    Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Sirocco20348; 09-05-2017 at 08:08 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brissy
    Posts
    2,207
    Users Country Flag
    28 is not enough.
    Generally the rule is, 2 x rim size + 2
    15inch = 32
    16inch = 34
    17inch = 36
    18inch = 38
    MK4 GTI - Sold
    MK5 Jetta Turbo - Sold
    MK5 Jetta 2.Slow - Until it dies.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Thanks for the advice - will up the pr sires to 34.

    i will post a pic tomorrow to show the camber - any advice is appreciated.

    cheers

    TH
    BMW 330i M Sport 2006
    Golf MKIV 2.0 Lt 2004

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    24
    Noticed the same on the Golf we have, regarding the camber, ours is 2003 model.

    Would be interested also to find out about this.
    Last edited by cartandpeg; 11-05-2017 at 07:53 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bairnsdale & Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    7,491
    There is anywhere from 1 and 1.5deg on the rear as standard.
    Keep in mind. Toe in Or out is more often the cause of wear then camber.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney/Canberra
    Posts
    5,523
    Users Country Flag
    I'd have thought being a beam axle, the camber would be relatively constant.

    Typical ride-height changes wouldn't affect it too much, if at all.
    '07 Transporter 1.9 TDI
    '01 Beetle 2.0

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    804
    Users Country Flag

    Yeh beam axle makes the camber static.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |