Support VWWC

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42

Thread: MK4 GTi Fuel Economy

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    362

    yher i remember when i first got mine i was suprised at the fuel economy

    i usually get anywhere between 500-600ish around town with a bit of a fang here and there, find that it drinks like i fish however during a long drive through the hills etc, although this is usually the case with most cars...

    translates to about 2 weeks of driving on one tank which is good news, although the soaring price of premium is starting to hurt...
    1999 MK4 GTi 1.8T - Custom Code Stg 1, ECS Stg 1, 14lb Fly, 18" A8's
    ''Jap cars pull the G-Forces... Euro cars pull the G-Strings...''

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland Australia
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by HOLEIN1 View Post
    yher i remember when i first got mine i was suprised at the fuel economy

    i usually get anywhere between 500-600ish around town with a bit of a fang here and there, find that it drinks like i fish however during a long drive through the hills etc, although this is usually the case with most cars...

    translates to about 2 weeks of driving on one tank which is good news, although the soaring price of premium is starting to hurt...
    well i drive a commodore and of 65L i get somewhere around 400kms to a tank ....hence why my move 2 a golf i cant wait too experence consumption under 10L per 100 kms lol becuase atm i dont even get that on the HWY and thats running premium.... i wonder if fuel prices are going to ever go back down ... i was liking it at 1.25 a L (1.38 for 98 )

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    362
    Quote Originally Posted by patullose View Post
    well i drive a commodore and of 65L i get somewhere around 400kms to a tank ....hence why my move 2 a golf i cant wait too experence consumption under 10L per 100 kms lol becuase atm i dont even get that on the HWY and thats running premium.... i wonder if fuel prices are going to ever go back down ... i was liking it at 1.25 a L (1.38 for 98 )
    yher mates 202 VK does something like 250-300/tank, crazy stuff...

    got a quick glimpse of the news last night and saw something about taxes possibly being dropped or something

    wishful thinking im guessing....

    was also an interesting report on 60 minutes last sun about australia and other countries such as canada possibly using oil deposits in rocks to maintain crude oil supply, although i think this was more of a measure to maintin a supplly rather than to reduce prices...
    1999 MK4 GTi 1.8T - Custom Code Stg 1, ECS Stg 1, 14lb Fly, 18" A8's
    ''Jap cars pull the G-Forces... Euro cars pull the G-Strings...''

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland Australia
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by HOLEIN1 View Post
    yher mates 202 VK does something like 250-300/tank, crazy stuff...

    got a quick glimpse of the news last night and saw something about taxes possibly being dropped or something

    wishful thinking im guessing....

    was also an interesting report on 60 minutes last sun about Australia and other countries such as Canada possibly using oil deposits in rocks to maintain crude oil supply, although i think this was more of a measure to maintain a supplly rather than to reduce prices...
    it sucks i cant understand it....."apparently" we've only used 18 percent of the worlds oil supply's ....it sucks altho one good point is that people are switching too smaller cars and using less fuel....so therefor its better for the environment......... if anyone other then me cares lol

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by patullose View Post
    i read some site that was comparing all the MK4 Golfs together...and it was saying that the GTi would get better fuel economy then the 2.0L N/A ...does this make sense to anyone?

    I know that the 2.0 is like .2 lts bigger then the golfs engine but the turbo would have alot too do with fuel consumption


    so from reading above it would be safe 2 say that if you wernt too heavy on the accelerator you'd easily be able 2 archive 8L too 100 K's or better??
    Turbos are more efficient generally, especially so when compared to similarly powered NA engines..

    Although if you push the turbo, it will use alot more fuel than the 2L, but it takes fuel to make power.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,920
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by patullose View Post
    people are switching too smaller cars and using less fuel....so therefor its better for the environment......... if anyone other then me cares lol
    Industry accounts for nearly all pollution it's just media crap the car is to blame. I'm concerned we're told we're using oil faster than we can pump it out the ground though!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland Australia
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by evorobin View Post
    Industry accounts for nearly all pollution it's just media crap the car is to blame. I'm concerned we're told we're using oil faster than we can pump it out the ground though!
    actully yes...thats true...i'm pretty sure i herd somewhere that cars in australia only account for like 7% of the problem...not too sure...but i know it was a low number and 7 enters my mind...

    over 25 percent tho is from cattle .....

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    898
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by dubbed View Post
    I got 650km driving from Adelaide to Melbourne with about seven odd litres left - easy another 50km in it. Around town I get at least 500-520kmkm with about five litres left in the tank, and that includes giving it a decent boot-full every now and then.
    Just thought I'd dig this thread up from the dead. Since last posting four years ago (scary how fast time flies) my fuel economy has gradually deteriorated. I'm now lucky to get 470 km to a tank (usually 450 km) but can get 550-570 km on long commutes. I always put in 98 from BP or Shell. I'll get new plugs and thermostat soon and further down the track, if I keep it, new coilpacks and O2 sensor.

    I should mention I still drive it very spirited
    2000 Mk IV GTI


  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Largs Bay, S.A.
    Posts
    750
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by dubbed View Post
    Just thought I'd dig this thread up from the dead. Since last posting four years ago (scary how fast time flies) my fuel economy has gradually deteriorated. I'm now lucky to get 470 km to a tank (usually 450 km) but can get 550-570 km on long commutes. I always put in 98 from BP or Shell. I'll get new plugs and thermostat soon and further down the track, if I keep it, new coilpacks and O2 sensor.

    I should mention I still drive it very spirited
    Have you had it scanned for fault codes at all?

    I flog my 2.0 slow and regularly get 630 - 650 km from a tank. (Once almost 700 km's)

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    2,310

    seems to depend a LOT on the type of driving you do ... I'm getting about 500km/tank in my GTI at the moment but most of it is freeway driving (80-100kmh) since I changed jobs. Previously was lucky at 450km/tank around the city / suburban driving.
    '03 BMP MkIV Golf GTI | Oettinger tune | K04 | 18" OZ
    '04 BMP MkIV R32 #144
    search getnew
    ozaudi | ozvolks | opelaus | ecca

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |