Support VWWC

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Considering a mk4 Golf...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camden, Sydney
    Posts
    7,377
    Users Country Flag

    VR6 Autos are Thirsty, as are all Autos. Go the manual every time.

    The Mk4s are good cars, heavy and solid, which is why they are not as quick as the earlier ones.

    Yes the plastic impeller is stupid. they did it on SEATs too. I replace em with metal ones too.
    Camden GTI Performance. VW / AUDI Specialists
    All Mechanical Work, Log book Servicing, New and used Parts and Imports
    19-20/6 Badgally Road, Campbelltown, 2560
    02 4627 3072 or 0423 051737 www.camdengti.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,215
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by dj_daniel88
    What is the GTI like on fuel compared to the 1.6?

    I don't have much cash to play with, only however much I will get for my VR6. Its a 97 auto, in excellent condition, 140kms on the clock. I don't think I could afford a GTI.

    Perhaps I could go somewhere in the middle, a 2.0 or the GTI. I get the impression that the 1.6 arent great with power.
    Power = $$$$$$, neither 1.6 nor 2.0 are powerful, they're great smooth running cars though. If you're used to your VR6 power, save up more money and get a Mk4 Gti.

  3. #13
    BLKMJC Guest
    Ive had mine for over a year now and love it. Only problem I've had was the coolant temp sensor went, replaced under warranty.

    Build quality is good, interior is nice and no rattles.

    If you want similar power to the VR6 get a GTI, anything less will be much slower. Once you chip the GTI it will be faster than the VR6 and use less petrol.

    BLKMJC

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,215
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by BLKMJC
    Once you chip the GTI it will be faster than the VR6 and use less petrol.

    BLKMJC
    Use less petrol than VR6 or Gti without chip

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camden, Sydney
    Posts
    7,377
    Users Country Flag
    I dont think the GTI is faster than the VR6. On the sydney cruise we raced a Mk5GTI with a chip and filter and he couldent beat either of a certain 2 VR6s.
    We were all trying. I`m not saying the Mk5 wouldn`t win up top, but 0-100, we had him. He probably used less petrol though. And old ladies on bikes are faster than auto Vr6s
    Camden GTI Performance. VW / AUDI Specialists
    All Mechanical Work, Log book Servicing, New and used Parts and Imports
    19-20/6 Badgally Road, Campbelltown, 2560
    02 4627 3072 or 0423 051737 www.camdengti.com

  6. #16
    BLKMJC Guest

    I doubt he was racing, a chipped V GTI has around 185kw and over 350nm torque. A VR6 even with mods wouldnt go past 140kw and 300nm, either he was a bad driver or not giving it all its got, or the VR6's have been turbo charged

    I have two friends with nice VR6's and my stock 1.8T loses by about 1 car length in a TLGP, and sometimes gains on rolling starts. Thats without a chip.

    Must be freakish VR6's

    BLKMJC

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Volkswagen Group Australia Sales Stats (Audi, SEAT, VW, VWCV) 1991-2008
    By phaeton in forum VW Watercooled Media Lounge & Interesting Articles
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-11-2010, 10:52 AM
  2. Electrical problems with VW Golf V towbar
    By JandG in forum Mk5 Golf & Jetta
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 08:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |