Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: New Amarok

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491

    New Amarok

    I took a new Amarok for a drive today, I was quite surprised by the car or ute....what ever you want to call it.

    I took out a trendline for a run up the highway quickly, I am very seriously considering buying one. I found it sat very well on the road and was good at 100km/h. It seemed that I was sitting up very high, but not intrusively so. The car felt VERY big, dad used to have a dual cab T3 transporter, and it felt much bigger than that.

    I only had one real issue with the car though, The tub or tray or what ever you want to call it was useless! The marketing ploy seems to be hitting on the whole pallet thing, but seriously who carries around a pallet if you are having the thing for private use. Personally I will be carrying a bike around in the back. This means that I will be driving around with the tail gate down, while that doesnt particularly worry me It is a bit of an inconvenience when your stands or anything else you want to put in the back will slide out on any decent sort of hill.

    All that being said, If I had the money I'd buy one tomorrow.

    Quick question to end my rant, what is the 2H I see on all the ad's? Is it just a series thing?
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    4,375
    Users Country Flag
    The internal code for the Amarok is Type 2H
    - Ben

    1961 Karmann Ghia Coupé - 1993 Golf Cabriolet - 2006 Golf Comfortline 1.9L TDI
    2008 Jetta 2.0L FSI

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by phaeton View Post
    The internal code for the Amarok is Type 2H
    Ah ok it makes sense, Thanks for that!

    I can't work out why there is such a difference in price for the same car. I was just looking at a basic Trendline which starts at about 47k. The equivalent in QLD is 52....Why such a difference???
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mill Park, Victoria
    Posts
    122
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Coxy09 View Post
    I took a new Amarok for a drive today, I was quite surprised by the car or ute....what ever you want to call it.

    I took out a trendline for a run up the highway quickly, I am very seriously considering buying one. I found it sat very well on the road and was good at 100km/h. It seemed that I was sitting up very high, but not intrusively so. The car felt VERY big, dad used to have a dual cab T3 transporter, and it felt much bigger than that.

    I only had one real issue with the car though, The tub or tray or what ever you want to call it was useless! The marketing ploy seems to be hitting on the whole pallet thing, but seriously who carries around a pallet if you are having the thing for private use. Personally I will be carrying a bike around in the back. This means that I will be driving around with the tail gate down, while that doesnt particularly worry me It is a bit of an inconvenience when your stands or anything else you want to put in the back will slide out on any decent sort of hill.

    All that being said, If I had the money I'd buy one tomorrow.

    Quick question to end my rant, what is the 2H I see on all the ad's? Is it just a series thing?
    All the 4wd dual cabs in the market have very similar tray lengths (for the factory, style side tray)

    FWIW, I used to carry a motorbike in the back of a D-Max all the time, tailgate down, and never had a problem of anything falling out, mostly because I used common sense and tied/roped/occy-strapped the stuff down

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by sh|tbmxrider View Post
    All the 4wd dual cabs in the market have very similar tray lengths (for the factory, style side tray)

    FWIW, I used to carry a motorbike in the back of a D-Max all the time, tailgate down, and never had a problem of anything falling out, mostly because I used common sense and tied/roped/occy-strapped the stuff down
    Yeah I still have an issue with it, You shouldn't need to tie everything down, its just stupid. Why have a ute if your going to have to tie it down....Im not looking for an argument here but its just silly. I'm thinking I might wait till the single cab comes out.

    On the thing about the bike if you hit a decent bump like some of the **** they have in Rural QLD or out back NSW the rear of the bike will move and that will cause the tail gate to move up and come crashing down which I cant imagine will do any good to it.
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491
    Thread Starter
    I know what everyone is about to say and that I'm not tying it down hard enough, but I do, I make sure the poofter of a thing wont fall over but I still remember the thing doing it when we had the transporter.
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mallacoota, Vic.
    Posts
    170
    Ah, maybe that's your problem. If you're comparing it to the old T3 DC, these had a much longer tray, as they were a cab-forward design. I think you'll find the Amarok tray specs are the equal of any other conventional DC (barring F100's etc), but if you want tray length in a DC ute, maybe you should look at a T5 transporter DC, in 4Motion, if you need the 4WD.

    Brian R

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by 4wheels View Post
    Ah, maybe that's your problem. If you're comparing it to the old T3 DC, these had a much longer tray, as they were a cab-forward design. I think you'll find the Amarok tray specs are the equal of any other conventional DC (barring F100's etc), but if you want tray length in a DC ute, maybe you should look at a T5 transporter DC, in 4Motion, if you need the 4WD.

    Brian R
    Nah I want an Amarok haha, Just being a little Bi**h I think, I need to harden up. I see there is some sort of C chanel frame for a bike to sit on in the tray which should work.

    Anyway I now have to replace the Compressor in the VR for the Aircon and then I will be a proud owner of a Amarok.
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,179
    Users Country Flag
    i drove a base model one and wasn't all that impressed. Far too underpowered un-loaded (I can't imgaine how gutless it would be loaded!!!), soggy feeling brake pedal and uber notchy gearbox were my main gripes. Also the sheer size of the thing! Quite large, but as mentioned before the tray is tiny and useless. I have bikes and motorbikes and there is no chance that they would fit!

    That said I havent tried the top spec, more powerful model

    Shame really because its an otherwise nice vehicle!
    VW: it aint just a car, its a way of life
    There are few things more satisfying in life than finding a solution to a problem and implementing it
    My Blog: tinkererstales.blogspot.com.au

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    491
    Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by GoLfMan View Post
    i drove a base model one and wasn't all that impressed. Far too underpowered un-loaded (I can't imgaine how gutless it would be loaded!!!), soggy feeling brake pedal and uber notchy gearbox were my main gripes. Also the sheer size of the thing! Quite large, but as mentioned before the tray is tiny and useless. I have bikes and motorbikes and there is no chance that they would fit!

    That said I havent tried the top spec, more powerful model

    Shame really because its an otherwise nice vehicle!
    So that was the TDI340???

    I have to take one for a real drive before I make my mind up completely, not this 5 minute thing that they all seem to like doing. I do agree with you though its a BIG vehicle and the tray is TINY! But that being said, I've always had old car's and its about time I get something nice. Im going up to Mackay though so I cant see the point in having a low thing and I refuse to own a Hilux.
    Coxy
    "Some people dream of achieving greatness, other people get out of bed and do it"

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |