data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4dc/ce4dc766328f3bc7b39f11f6b9d7236e8e52d989" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
Transporter
The Amarok is utility vehicle, most people who buy them are tradies. How many tradies take their kids to their job sites? Now, forget about the ute, how often you see more than 2 people in any car?
I’m thinking about updating my 2013 Amarok and don’t need the rear airbags, more airbags could mean more expensive insurance as well.
Luck of airbags, doesn’t worry me, though they should put the rear air went there, my dog would really appreciate it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a6a8/6a6a8ac8ceb8e9b8b6ef7bb0e1a4649415dd699e" alt="Sticky out tounge"
Otherwise, it’s perfect vehicle. Stuff the media and incompetent journalists who can’t focus on anything else than luck of the rear airbags.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92382/923822c60989d9ea2ff2610aa0a40af652fe696b" alt="Face Palm"
I agree.
We buy Amarok twincabs at work (we'd have about 30 in the fleet). Our main purpose of the back seat is storage of PPE and other equipment with very occasional (maybe 1%) passenger use. Personally, I think there are better solutions but I'm not the fleet manager.
Other twincabs (any brand) that I see don't seem to get a lot of back seat use.
carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums
Bookmarks