Interesting - my perspective of the effect of strut bars when used in competition has mainly been with rally cars where side loadings aren't quite so high and bump loadings are far worse. Still, the fact that most strut braces don't connect in a straight line from tower to tower (they usually need a couple of bends to clear engine components) makes me dubious of most alloy strut braces.
Thanks though - always good to have something pointed out.
Resident grumpy old fart
VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS
the older & the more worn the car is the more itll bennefit. on my old VN commodore cheap strut brace made a stunning difference (they had shocking movement in their towers)
90 TSI 1.4T
in terms of the original question, I think the most accurate answer is this:
If you plot density against material stiffness, you will find that you can almost always make a more efficient structure out of steel than from aluminium. However, the nature of the component has a large part to play in the design compromises that always need to be made.
Nonetheless, for an essentially basic component like a strut brace, you will have far more success with little effort with steel than you could with aluminium. Sure, you could make a good one out of aluminium, but not without an aweful lot more work.
'07 Touareg V6 TDI with air suspension
'98 Mk3 Cabriolet 2.0 8V
'99 A4 Quattro 1.8T
Yank physics.
Beige 79 Mk1 GLD White 76 Mk1 LS 3 door
White 68 Alfa 1750 Berlina Champagne 91 Alfa 75
Red 09 9N3 Polo TDI White 2010 Skoda Octavia Combi TDI
Bookmarks