Originally Posted by
nomadx38
Why is it for a car that is the exact same as the Polo GTI (except the frame / platform) is it .4 seconds slower to 100km/h.
Also dual fuel injection...I'm not too sure about that!
Somebody is getting ripped off
It's not .4 second slower, that's just the officially quoted time. The general suspicion on Briskoda is that VW have "suggested" to Skoda that they not show up the more expensive model. The weight is also doubtful, or at least measured differently to the VW. One thing is for sure, there is 25kg of weights hiding under the left rear bumper of the Fabia hatch. Some sort of "counter-balancing" or old fashioned sand-bagging? My money is on the latter...
For proof, Australian Motor Magazine tested both of these cars in 2012 Bang for your Buck challenge. The Polo was, from memory, about 3/100 of a second quicker to 100kph. Interestingly, the Fabia was a 1/100 quicker than the Audi A1 Sport.
Now gone.... 2012 Skoda Fabia RS
Bookmarks