What have you done with your Polo so far (and today)

[Lemonskin]

quick look says et42. will fit but will have similar fitment to the stock wheels (will sit 4mm out from stock(not alot))

also, what site are you using? good to have a visual of the car...

Hmmm that sounds ok. It's the Beaurepairs website.

[LD_mart]

Picked up these puppies, Eibach Pro Street S coilovers

[PGTI]

Fitted Milltek catback exhaust.

[llai8501]

Nice sound! Feel any performance differences?

[PGTI]

Probably just placebo. But the dsg fart and the sound when you hit the gas is awesome.
Tune and downpipe next.

[kam]

What did i do to my Polo today?

Bought him a big brother

[Lemonskin]

Washed, vacuumed, and polished the Polo in preparation for the cruise to Bathurst tomorrow. Anyone else going?

[dening]

Had chrome tailgate strip fitted.





Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

[Lucas_R]

Not quite right there mate, yes they increase airflow with the filters but I am yet to see a single after-market filter provide EQUAL, let alone better filtration than from the factory. It's a trade off, more airflow (which as you correctly pointed out, is only really beneficial to those with an ECU tune) with less filtration....

Hi Gavs - ive seen you mention the comment regarding air filters before, and i agree that there is some trade off in filtering ability to increase flow, but i found this test and thought it was interesting. K&N performed very well. Some of the big name Jap brand filters were not so good.

http://www.australianauto.com.au/htm...hoot%20Out.pdf

[brad]

Lucas, How did all those filters compare with an equivalent surface area OEM paper filter? Until you have that as a baseline the other filters flow rates & filtering capacity can only be compared amongst themselves. ie: The K&N might filter the best but if that's 20% worse than an OEM paper filter then the decrease in filtering might be unacceptable to many people.