data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4dc/ce4dc766328f3bc7b39f11f6b9d7236e8e52d989" alt="Quote Quote"
Originally Posted by
gavs
RE: Diesel_vert, I thought this until I had a certificate of roadworthyness rejected on my previous vehicle (Mk4 Golf) due to running one Khumo KU-31 and one Dunlop SP Sport 2000, both the same size. I'm hoping you are correct however because I thought the guy was a bit of a knob, he also did me because he thought my rear rotors were too thin, yet they still fell into spec!
That's absolute nonsense - the clueless inspector doesn't know what they're talking about.
VSI No. 26: Roadworthiness Requirements
SECTION A
Wheels and Tyres
For vehicles up to 4.5 tonne GVM fitted with passenger car tyres and manufactured after
1 January 1973, all tyres fitted to the road wheels must be of the same carcass construction
(i.e. radial ply, cross ply, bias belted, etc) but may have a different tread pattern.
Source: VicRoads - Vehicle Standards Information No. 26: Roadworthiness Requirements
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4dc/ce4dc766328f3bc7b39f11f6b9d7236e8e52d989" alt="Quote Quote"
Originally Posted by
Blitzen
I think you'll find that they have to be the same tread pattern too...
I'm not familiar with the regulations in the ACT... but I doubt it.
Bookmarks