Support VWWC

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Next generation Polo GTI to retain current motor?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    294
    Users Country Flag

    Here is the ballast. I'm not unsure it isn't sand-bagging, though I suppose they'd put it all the way across in that case, rather than in one corner.
    Now gone.... 2012 Skoda Fabia RS

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    856
    Users Country Flag
    If you guys haven't researched on the net, the next Polo GTI (updated for 2015) will have the 1.4ltr engine, 141kw and avail in Manual and DSG. It will only be single charged. The Polo GTI will continue to have the 1.4ltr engine, nothing bigger.
    [FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Matt
    2015 Skoda Octavia RS | Combi | DSG | Metallic Grey | Tech Pack, Every Option Except Leather |
    Prev: 2012 VW Polo GTI | 5dr | DSG | Reflex Silver | RCD510 |

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by MJKooLio View Post
    If you guys haven't researched on the net, the next Polo GTI (updated for 2015) will have the 1.4ltr engine, 141kw and avail in Manual and DSG. It will only be single charged. The Polo GTI will continue to have the 1.4ltr engine, nothing bigger.
    I have done quite a bit of googling and can't find information to support your suggestion; although, perhaps my internet skills are lacking. Would you mind pointing me in the direction of the source of your opinion please?

    Thanks in advance.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ringwood, Victoria
    Posts
    4,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Rubbadub View Post
    Here is the ballast. I'm not unsure it isn't sand-bagging, though I suppose they'd put it all the way across in that case, rather than in one corner.
    Exactly. It's moved around on lhd models to counter the drivers weight as well.

    Stage 2+ Intercooler Carbon Intake Downpipe Swaybar DV+ Remsa.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    45
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by MattyMcFly View Post
    I have done quite a bit of googling and can't find information to support your suggestion; although, perhaps my internet skills are lacking. Would you mind pointing me in the direction of the source of your opinion please?

    Thanks in advance.
    March 2014 Wheels magazine.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by rabbitz View Post
    March 2014 Wheels magazine.
    Which came out in Feb and was likely wrapped up in Jan. As far as i can tell the info on the updated polo came out very late jan.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    45
    Users Country Flag
    Your point is?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central VIC
    Posts
    644
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    From the above can we assume that the supercharger is being dropped in place of a larger turbo (the latter required to compensate for loss of supercharger)? i.e how do they propose to maintain/slightly increase power output. One would hope the revised engine has a fix for the oil consumption issues.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central VIC
    Posts
    644
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    I'm thinking the lack of replies to the above means no one knows exactly what VW have planned for the revised/new GTI engine Guess we'll all find out in October!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    332
    Users Country Flag

    Max kw figures only sell cars, they dont make them go fast. At the moment the supercharger would be having most impact at lower rpm and less of an impact at peak power which would be sourced mostly from the turbo. So you could take out the supercharger and it would have little if any effect on the peak kW. It will lose some bottom end so compensate the 0-100 time by adding a few kw peak. That can easily done with a tune along with all kinds of internal development work. Even if its faster on paper it might not be as nice to drive. Just supposing. Or maybe its an entirely different 1.4 litre.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |