Quote Originally Posted by nomadx38 View Post
Actually they had this exact kind of test done in the cars guide comparing between the performance/fuel economy and price of different types of fuel.
Yes - I remember that test - $107 less to run 95 is compelling
It seems like a big price difference at the servo but mileage makes it work out ok
(Other tests have shown E10 to be marginally more cost effective )
Trouble is prices have changed, I have not bought 98 for $1.50 for ages
I just don't worry about price/value any more - 95/98 all the time