Support VWWC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Best rim size and lowering kit/coilovers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    11
    Users Country Flag

    Best rim size and lowering kit/coilovers

    Hi Guys

    I am new to these forums. i recently got myself a 2011 1.4 VVW Polo Comfortline. I am from South Africa. i am stuck between a 15'', 16'' and 17'' rim and cannot decide which one will be the best in terms of fuel consumption, loss of power and wear and tear on the car. the car originally have the 15" Riverside alloy wheels with 185/60 R 15 tyres.
    specs Polo Range. < Polo < Models < Volkswagen South Africa
    i was thinking of putting on the Budapest 7½J x 17" alloy 215/40 R 17 Cross Polo Rims. how will these rims affect the above mentioned concerns.

    which lowering kit/coilovers will be best for my car. we have a distributor for eibach lowering kits. what is the difference between the lowering kit and the coilovers and which is better and cheaper. which of the 2 will not compromise the ride quality.

    i would appreciate your guys input.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    350
    Users Country Flag
    g'day Steve, welcome aboard

    If anything fuel consumption, power (to weight) and handling will improve, albeit by a small fraction. The alloys should be ligher and therefore better for fuel economy. Ride quality may not be as good with the smaller profile tyres. The Budapests are a standard Polo size so you won't have any fitment issues (i', assuming the offset is the same as the Boavista wheels.

    both lowering coils/kit and coil-overs will make the ride harsher (but handling better). Coil overs are goind to be about 4 times the price of coils alone. H&R seem to be popular, can't comment on eibach though.
    MY18 Golf 7.5R - Ecotune Stage 1
    Mazda RX2 - 13B Bridgeport GTX4202R

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ringwood, Victoria
    Posts
    4,140
    If your car came with 15" wheels, the first thing you will notice going to the larger alloy is the decrease in ride comfort. You have suddenly lost 2" of nice, squishy, compliant rubber between the road and the wheel rim. You will also see a loss in perceived power due to the rolling diameter increasing, hence the handle point of the wheel acting upon the drive shaft is further away so more energy is required to turn the wheel, but this will also be compunded by the increase in weight, especially evident on your 1.4 Naturally Aspirated Polo. The 17" polo wheels, with tyres are all ~20kgs. I am not sure what the 15" wheels you pulled off weigh but I doubt they will be this much.

    My suggestion would be go far as light an alloy as you can afford if you are after handling and drivability, if you are purely after looks, then it doesn't really matter and the difference while evident on the drag strip or on a track, probably won't show up that much in daily driving.

    Regarding springs, Eibach have been around for years and the only reason more people haven't used them is because H&R were first to market, so the first people bought them, and then they reccomend them so it becomes the "norm". To give you an idea of the pedigree of the Eibach product, Eibach make all the springs for Bilstein cup kits and also their lower-end coilovers. They are bloody good spring manufacturers.

    In regards to the difference between the coilover kit vs just the lowering kit, the lowering springs will give you an approximate drop in ride height with just replacing the springs. These springs are somewhat matched to factory dampers to try and retain a stock-ish ride but they do become stiffer towards the end of their travel to stop bottoming out, this is why they're called "proggresive rate" springs. The coilovers however are full replacement dampers and springs that are matched together so that the spring forces match to the rates that the damper can dispell the energy. On these vehicles, the rear is separated and the front is a full replacement strut. The "advantage" in regards to lowering with coilovers is that you can go as low as you want based on the design of the setup and the springs should still match the damping rates, depending on the brand. This however will come at the detriment of ride control and handling prowess.

    So, in conclusion, if you just want to go as low as you can, look at coilovers. If you just want to lower the car a littel bit, go the springs. If you want to go a bit lower as well as better handling prowess, a matched spring and damper setup or good quality coilovers are the choice.

    Stage 2+ Intercooler Carbon Intake Downpipe Swaybar DV+ Remsa.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    11
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Thanks guys for your input. i really do appreciate it. i think i will put on the cross polo rim withe a 215x40x17 tyre on and then decide if i want to lower the car or not. that is the best rim that i can find at the moment. will post some pics soon

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dunlop ACT
    Posts
    86
    Users Country Flag
    you will see a significant decrease in ride quality going down to that tyre size. Think carefully about the types of roads you drive on. I took the 18s off my octavia RS as they did not work at all for me off the freeway.

    MY11 Skoda Octavia vRS ("GT") wagon, TDI, DSG, candy white, downsized (upgraded) to 16" alloys & 225/50 R16s, leather, tint, towbar, 70w HID lightforce strikers




  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    11
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by DunlopRS View Post
    you will see a significant decrease in ride quality going down to that tyre size. Think carefully about the types of roads you drive on. I took the 18s off my octavia RS as they did not work at all for me off the freeway.
    what tyre do you suggest then or what would suit the car the best

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dunlop ACT
    Posts
    86
    Users Country Flag
    I guess I should re phrase - "going down" to that profile.

    I personally would not go below a 50 profile. Its all to do with the sorts of roads you drive on and personal choice - for me my car is primarily to get me from A to B as fast as is allowed in comfort and safety. Looking good in relation to rim size is a bonus. On the 40s that were on the 18s I did not get any of those 3 (especially as fast as is allowed) - and I felt that I was going to break something (I have bent the tops of shocker towers on previous cars - on roads called national highways in Australia - and did not want to go there again).

    If it was me, I would see what options I had around a 50 or 55 series tyre re width/rim size combinations to give the correct diameter/rolling circumference. There won't be many.

    FWIW here is my (recent) story - reference to some size calculators in there etc
    http://www.vwwatercooled.org.au/foru...vrs-73054.html

    If it were also for me - I would make sure the tyre was at least a little wider than the rim so when the inevitable happens and someone brushes a kerb the tyre protects the rim....

    Good luck.
    Last edited by DunlopRS; 03-09-2012 at 09:03 PM.

    MY11 Skoda Octavia vRS ("GT") wagon, TDI, DSG, candy white, downsized (upgraded) to 16" alloys & 225/50 R16s, leather, tint, towbar, 70w HID lightforce strikers




  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    3,178
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfoot View Post
    The alloys should be ligher and therefore better for fuel economy.
    From the OP

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevie G View Post
    the car originally have the 15" Riverside alloy wheels with 185/60 R 15 tyres.
    As for Stevie G's questions, see gavs response - it's all there.
    Resident grumpy old fart
    VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ringwood, Victoria
    Posts
    4,140
    40 series rubber isn't the issue, it's the width factory that generates the profile height. If you have a 205 width tyre then 40 series rubber will give you a sidewall height of 80mm. On a Porsche type tyre, 40 series rubber will give you a sidewall height of 130mm. It's all relative and down to the person. My GTI has 40 series boots on 215mm tyres and it's not the tyres that give it a stuff ride, but will I get the same tyres when I replace them? Nope, I'm going wider so this will also increase the sidewall height.

    Stage 2+ Intercooler Carbon Intake Downpipe Swaybar DV+ Remsa.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dunlop ACT
    Posts
    86
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by gavs View Post
    40 series rubber isn't the issue, it's the width factory that generates the profile height....
    .
    granted -they go hand-in-hand

    MY11 Skoda Octavia vRS ("GT") wagon, TDI, DSG, candy white, downsized (upgraded) to 16" alloys & 225/50 R16s, leather, tint, towbar, 70w HID lightforce strikers




Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |