Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: VW Polo GTi (Stock) Baseline Dyno

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    221

    VW Polo GTi (Stock) Baseline Dyno

    Hi Guys,

    Went to performed baseline dyno last week and here's the figure I've got:

    Figure quoted on wheel reading
    Power: 140.52PS @ 5200rpm
    Torque: 215.62NM @ 3000rpm
    Boost: 0.91 @ 3000rpm
    AF Ratio: 1:13.9

    Based on the figure, I could fairly say that VW has made a conservative claim on horsepower and torque figure which should have been 165PS/252NM on engine. However, my tuner mentioned that because of the emission control and exhaust, the power/torque curve isn't smooth throughout rev range and AF ratio is way too lean for turbo engine and to a certain extend NA.

    Baseline Dyno:




    VW Polo GTi (Stock) Vs Proton Satria GTi (Mild Mod)

    Last edited by firdausasri; 07-07-2008 at 11:41 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    697
    Huh 140 PS (Metric HP) is 103 kw atw. That's well above what they do stock atw. The numbers make no sense.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Australia?
    Posts
    6,035
    Users Country Flag
    Was it an aussie built dyno, you must have had your tyre psi wrong or something, I call this shinanigans!
    I'm soo euro even my missus is shaved...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    221
    Thread Starter
    I doubt so because GT Auto is one of the reputable tuning shop building up engines for racing & drag application. The reading here is quite conservative comparing with the rest dyno machines in here.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    944
    Weird charts

    Power and torque curves are usually much smoother...and the AFR is bizarre.

    How many k's has the car done?
    2015 White German SUV
    2013 White German hatch
    2011 Silver French hot hatch
    2008 TR Golf GT TDI DSG

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    697
    Quote Originally Posted by firdausasri View Post
    ...should have been 165PS/252NM on engine
    How do you figure that? The stock figures are 150PS/220NM at the engine (or 123PS at the wheel). With 140 PS atw you're too high for stock and you're too low to be chipped. I'd suggest getting a baseline figure somewhere else as the results are abnormal.
    Last edited by GT3; 07-07-2008 at 06:06 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    867
    Quote Originally Posted by GT3 View Post
    How do you figure that? The stock figures are 150PS/220NM at the engine (or 123PS at the wheel). With 140 PS atw you're too high for stock and you're too low to be chipped. I'd suggest getting a baseline figure somewhere else as the results are abnormal.

    My car was bout 12 months old when this was done. Totally stock.

    aus liebe zum automobil

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    221
    Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by GT3 View Post
    How do you figure that? The stock figures are 150PS/220NM at the engine (or 123PS at the wheel). With 140 PS atw you're too high for stock and you're too low to be chipped. I'd suggest getting a baseline figure somewhere else as the results are abnormal.
    GT3,

    Based on 15% drivetrain loss. I agree claimed 150PS at the engine. FYI, the car is brand new 2008 model clocking 1900kms. Done through test the car before dyno, seems like I could hit 230 with ease (and I mean really). Another car dynoed is my friend Colt Ralliart Mivec 1.5T (claimed 150HP at engine) dynoed at the same place 126PS. I'll scout around for another tuning house and redo again baseline dyno run. Just that the AFR figure kinda worries me.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |