Thanks for all the advice people. I really dont know why VW didnt make the wheels 17 imo it would look much better.
Thanks Guy
Printable View
Mate im running 17x8 w/ a 45 offset, than spacing back out to what would equate to; front 11mm spacer or new offset of 34, rear 16mm spacer or new offset 29, downfall is when you re-adjust coilovers to set low its hard to drive on bumpy surfaces, rubs everywhere, but looks the goods. now to drive it the it was ment to be driven I take it up 25mm rear and 35mm front, but now you can hit it hard and even brake harder,
Just my fifty cents worth.
Cheers ssman
Well ive decided to go for 17" x 8j offset of 33 lowerd 35mm with a profile of 45 should be okay?
that depends on the width of the wheelQuote:
40 profile is the correct match for 17's.
the profile is actually the percentage in millimeters of the tyres width
so a 40 profile for a polo will only keep the rolling diameter constant is the width of the tyre is 205. but nevertheless a 45 profile while seeming safer is definitely going to change the rolling diameter of the complete wheel unless its on a very narrow tyre
the trick to this profile business is to remember that what it means is that the sidewall is going to be the profile percentage of the tyre width so its got a relation and it isnt a constant measurement - it varies according to tyre width
this site allows you to play with tyre widths and profiles to keep the same rolling diameter
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html