Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 92

Thread: so what intercooler now???

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,297

    Quote Originally Posted by h100vw View Post
    If you compress air it gets hotter, physics, you can't avoid it. No idea what the ratio of pressure to heat is though.

    Off to google it now though.
    What about the efficiency of the turbo. I recall reading on Hot4's many years ago about a turbo operating beyond it's efficient boost levels will generate significantly more heat, yet minimal power. Is either application perhaps nudging the efficiency max of the turbo?
    Track Car: 06 Polo GTI Red Devil mkII
    Daily: 2010 VW Jetta Highline
    Gone but not forgotten: 08 Polo GTI
    ** All information I provide is probably incorrect until validated by someone else **

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bentleigh East, Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    492
    Thread Starter
    So it may just be franken/k004 with a decent FMIC. This would then mean that the larger turbo will not have to work as hard, so temps will be lower? , and a custom code flash can do that.
    Does that sound right ?
    Last edited by clicht; 27-08-2012 at 05:16 PM.
    Polo 9n3 GTI

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    285
    Users Country Flag
    My THS intercooler arrived today. Hopefully will be installing this weekend if I get all the other bits a pieces.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    3,178
    Users Country Flag
    So far, the only solid conclusion is that all the FMICs are better than the stock SMIC
    Resident grumpy old fart
    VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bentleigh East, Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    492
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by kaanage View Post
    So far, the only solid conclusion is that all the FMICs are better than the stock SMIC
    Haha
    Polo 9n3 GTI

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bentleigh East, Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    492
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Redliner View Post
    My THS intercooler arrived today. Hopefully will be installing this weekend if I get all the other bits a pieces.
    Keen to see how this goes...take pics..pls
    Polo 9n3 GTI

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    APR tunes and Forge front mount coolers have shown good (but not amazing) numbers on a number of different cars. If you are happy with 135kw ATW, this is a proven path.

    Not to say that other tunes aren't just as reliable or anything, just a tried and tested combination seen a few times.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    84
    Users Country Flag
    No one is debating the Forge IC keeps the intake temperature cool, but it is the coolers throughput which is in question. Guy H a while ago, in another thread which I am too lazy to go and find, provided dyno results between my car and Eddies. The only real difference was mine had a Forge intercooler. Eddies produced about another 7KW more than mine and his boost was better. I changed the IC to an APR one and re-dynoed the car and then my figures pretty well mapped Eddies. I thought this was just a K04 issue, but looking at what vwindahouse has shown with his car this is not the case. Anyways each to there own....

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bentleigh East, Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    492
    Thread Starter
    So it seems according to pogo_55 that more power was generated through having less back pressure than having cooler charge....interesting. Perhaps the ths may be the best, as it should have low back pressure, but since it has a larger core thqn the seat, it should cool beter???
    Polo 9n3 GTI

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by pogo_55 View Post
    No one is debating the Forge IC keeps the intake temperature cool, but it is the coolers throughput which is in question. Guy H a while ago, in another thread which I am too lazy to go and find, provided dyno results between my car and Eddies. The only real difference was mine had a Forge intercooler. Eddies produced about another 7KW more than mine and his boost was better. I changed the IC to an APR one and re-dynoed the car and then my figures pretty well mapped Eddies. I thought this was just a K04 issue, but looking at what vwindahouse has shown with his car this is not the case. Anyways each to there own....
    Nice one Kenny! Guys I think there is a direct correlation better torque figures, requested boost levels and intake temps. Look at Eddy's, Jason and my torque figures

    Jason 366nm End intake temp 49
    Eddy 358nm End intake temp 44
    My 348nm End intake temp 45

    All had higher intake temps

    Look at the the cars with a lot less torque, Leitch, Sharkie

    Sharkie 312nm End intake temp 40
    Leitch 303nm End intake temp 32

    Intake temps are clearly not robbing any of the top 3 of power and especially torque. Also look at the requested boost figures from Sams graphs. The turbos are not working any where near as hard on Sharkies and Leitchs cars.








    So what other proof do we have now thanks to Kenny. Both a k03s and K04 polo increased by 6 and 7kw atw when changing from a forge intercooler as a result of better boost pressure from the new intercoolers.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |