valves are :
inlet - 3 x 27.35mm roughly
exhaust - 2 x 29.87 roughly
I had a link to a site where they'd compared the cfm of the large port head to small port heads and I remember you saying at the time that the head was heavily biased towards excessive exhaust flow relative to inlet flow. I know in the past i've seen it said that if there is a high EGT issue then its most likely due to restrictive exhaust manifold and/or turbo sizing on theses engines but not likely from an under done exhaust valve/port from the head itself. Hopefully thats true. On the inlet side, the inlet valves are the same whether you have the small or large port head, its just that the large port head has just that, larger ports and does flow more due to that. So by going large port I have swung the inlet to be more balanced against the high exhaust flow but still the head is over exhausted from OEM.
Attachment 53343LP vs SP. all valves common. combustion chamber common. only the inlet port size varies. LP inlet cfm at 50 thou is higher suggesting a port restriction on the sP head.
The OEM head is fastened with stretch to yield bolts. Not sure if ARP do bolts too but they do do ARP studs.
Good call re the sodium filled valves maybe carrying more material to compensate for the infill and maybe actually being heavier. I'll try to find out what the weights are of OEM vs Supertech stainless.
If I have a cent left over for the head, it'll either have to be valves or ARP head fasteners but not both. Anecdotally it seems to be that that exhaust valves are seen as more of a reliability issue than OEM head gaskets/ head fasteners but i'll need to obviously detective out which is the bigger potential issue.