98ron
As you are aware, high compression engines deliver more power, with or without additional inlet compression (e.g. turbo- and super-chargers). The high performance VW engines have higher compression (more than 9:1; e.g. 1.6l = 10.5:1; the 2.0FSI =11.5:1; my 1.4TSI = 10.5:1).
91RON is designed to ignite with lower compression motors. 98RON is designed to work with higher compression engines without pre-igniting (ie detonating at the wrong stage of the four-stroke engine cycle). 91RON will explode at lower compression rates (with less power). 95RON is in the middle there. Modern engines with electronic management systems can adjust the ignition timing to allow for lower octane fuels (eg 95RON and 91RON). VWs do this to work with 95RON... don't know whether they are designed to adjust for 91RON. Other cars also do this (such as Corollas, which work with 91RON but also with higher octane fuels).
Perhaps 98RON is more refined or has more additives to suit the higher compression engines. However, I wonder whether this accounts for the price differential. It seems unlikely the manufacturing/delivery costs increased for Shell by 3c to justify the increased margin (10 to 13c). I expect it is a marketing decision... just like closing pumps mid-week!
TG
Last edited by tdi guy; 27-12-2008 at 05:54 PM.
(formerly TSI GUY)
First car: 1972 White Super Bug S
First Golf: MY08 Candy White Golf GT Sport TSI DSG
Now: MY13 Candy White Golf VI 2.0 TDI DSG (yes, I've come over to 'the dark side'...)
Bookmarks