Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: negative wheel offset

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag

    negative wheel offset

    Is it true that the early polo gti's had a slightly different standard wheel offset to the later models? If so, anyone know which of the gti wheels had the greatest negative offset and what model years they were from?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bairnsdale & Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    7,491
    No 9n would have had had negative offsets regardless of width

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    739
    I think there was a change by about 5mm somewhere along the piece, but in any case they're still very 'positive'
    Cheap, Fast, Reliable. Choose two.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    ok I thought they were near zero for some reason - and only 5mm difference - that sucks. Any ideas which model years had the wheels with the least positive offset then?thanks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Albury, NSW
    Posts
    741
    Users Country Flag
    Are you sure this is 9N and not 6R? 6R's added optioned wheels from Denvers to Detroits. - 9Ns stayed the same through production. The only way to find out is to get every 9N owner to post they're build date and offsets. I'm 2006 and I'm pretty sure ET43.
    2019 132TSI Tiguan
    2011 Audi S4 Wagon
    1988 MK1 Caddy
    2006 Polo GTI

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    no I'm certain of nothing. I just remember reading somewhere on here when people were discussing how gearbox changes were made throughout the model years and which years had the best boxes, that it was mentioned that wheel offsets had varied too. Can't find it again though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    Get some 8" Enkei's, 35 is a nice stance.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    ha ha. No I don't have the dosh for that. Just thought that if there was a fair amount more neg. offset to be had which could potentially benefit the steering, that someone might want to swap wheels for the wider stance ones. From the sound of it though its doubtful whether there is any offset variation anyway let alone a big enough one to be felt at the wheel.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuwey View Post
    I think there was a change by about 5mm somewhere along the piece, but in any case they're still very 'positive'
    GTI - up to early 06 had ET 43, later 06 to 09 had ET 38. Best aftermarket wheels are ET 35.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter

    sorry sorry. my shift worker brain gets muddy sometimes. When I was talking negative offsets what I meant to ask was which of the standard wheels offsets would give the most favourable scrub radius for ideal steering geometry (usually slight neg.). So you guys say that the ET35's are the best. Is that because it creates the closets thing to ideal scrub radius or because of aesthetics?

    thanks

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |