Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Max K03 Tune

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by noone View Post
    Is it just me, or are the numbers pulled in Aus lower or the dyno's reading lower? Always seems like stock numbers are a little lower here... Could just be my poor kw-hp conversion in my mind.
    We can't compare our tunes to the euro tuners most of the time.

    They are happy to push the limits a little more on the knowledge that the climate will always be cooler and heat related issues won't be as big of a problem. Look at the drag racing scene, for a long time most of the 4cylinder/rotary records were held by South American tuners simply because the location of the tracks in relation to the elevation, climate, and the number of trees in the area supplying oxygen.

    At 20psi on our K03s we are already way up the end of the efficiency range of our turbos, it very quickly gets to a point where there is simply no benefit to add any more boost due to the extra heat being added negating the addition of the boost in the first place.

    Either way, my opinion is still that if you're looking to spend the cash for a max K03s tune, then it would yield better results for similar cash by opting to go for a bigger turbo instead.
    Last edited by break; 13-04-2010 at 03:09 PM.
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    419
    Differences in fuel between here and Europe will make a bit of a difference as well ... 98 RON maximum is rubbish

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by DeanB View Post
    Differences in fuel between here and Europe will make a bit of a difference as well ... 98 RON maximum is rubbish
    Most of Europe only have 97/98 octane... with only a select few places at 100/102 ron.

    Either way, if you want big power from a turbo you're better off with E85 (so long as you have the fuel delivery systems to accomodate the extra ~30% flow rate needed)
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    419
    Quote Originally Posted by break View Post
    Most of Europe only have 97/98 octane... with only a select few places at 100/102 ron.

    Either way, if you want big power from a turbo you're better off with E85 (so long as you have the fuel delivery systems to accomodate the extra ~30% flow rate needed)
    With E85 (any Ethanol fuel blend imo) you are opening a can of worms and I can't see it being worth it. Also, E85 is only about 94 Octane, so it isn't the greatest fuel for performance, so I can see why you'd need to pump more in to get power.

    100 RON or higher here would make me happy.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    218
    Users Country Flag
    the reason HP figures are lower in australia might have somting to do with the heat.
    it's a warm country and a stock IC can hold power long.
    so you guys probably have heatsoak right away.
    and it's a common fact that when it's hot, Hp will be lower then when it's colder.
    also sea-level has invluence on HP-output.

    about the reliability, it's nice to have 10 - 20Hp more then you have now.
    is it worth it?
    i think so...
    it all comes to how you drive the car also.
    if you go to the red zone and rev limiter, shift like a maniac and use the power every single day, you should not go to the max. capacity of the turbo.
    you will only end up destroying it.
    if you drive it with a bit of common sence, it should be allright.
    allways drive easy when the engine is cold.
    install a oil temp gauge to know when the oil is at temp. (important)
    if you do this it's hard to break the turbo or engine.
    but it's normal for when you ask more from the turbo, you will ask more from his reliability.
    life span is in your own hands most of the time

    but if the turbo comes to an end, it's a good time to go for a K04-001 :p
    Last edited by instigator; 13-04-2010 at 09:13 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by DeanB View Post
    With E85 (any Ethanol fuel blend imo) you are opening a can of worms and I can't see it being worth it. Also, E85 is only about 94 Octane, so it isn't the greatest fuel for performance, so I can see why you'd need to pump more in to get power.

    100 RON or higher here would make me happy.
    I think you'll find a LOT of turbo/import people in the drag scene use E85 for its performance qualities (once you tune the car for the fuel).

    Hell, have a look at the video HPF did to test various fuel types: Episode 10 Now Online – The Fuel Test | OzGarage

    Octane isn't everything, the temperature and speed of the burn are more important... and this is where E85 blitzes normal fuels, particularly in the burn temperature stakes.

    It's much the same reason methanol is used in racing... it's not because of the octane, its purely because of the burn temperature.
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by noone View Post

    Is it just me, or are the numbers pulled in Aus lower or the dyno's reading lower? Always seems like stock numbers are a little lower here... Could just be my poor kw-hp conversion in my mind.
    The whp figures used on AUS dyno's (Mainline / Dyno Dynamics) always read lower than US based dyno's (dynojet & Mustang) - Dynapack ones read pretty much the same around the world - as long as you look at uncorrected data, not SAE or DIN corrected data.

    Maha & Bosch dyno's read similar to Mainline when using SAE corrected wheel number, but the crank correction is Waaaaay different!

  8. #18
    Maybe noone should re name the thrread "How much power can a K03 make for a very short time" - or "Hand grenade tune!"

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Mexico
    Posts
    8,979
    Users Country Flag

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    Thread Starter

    Nice!

    Whilst I'm not interested in running stupid boost, I do find it interesting how the different tunes get their power. I think its fair to say that I don't know enough to be able to compare tunes other than with my butt-feel, but I think there is quite a difference between how the power is mapped.

    I'm seeing some tunes hit psi's in the early 20's whilst the APR seems to top out at about 17 (no spiking logged with Vag-com).

    I'm pretty confident with the FMIC and other mods I've done that the setup should be able to handle more than 17psi reliably... Just have to decide on which of the paths I'm going down (Garret or retune).

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |