Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: LCA bushes, who's using what

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058

    Its hard to say without trying both, either are better than stock, improving geometry is a great idea, a vibrating bumpy ride is the trade off.
    I'd go road over race, the extra stiffness is going to be a huge negative for daily driving IMO.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    535
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    I'm going with the road anti lift (3273) set. Report back in a few weeks.
    Last edited by rgvlee; 21-07-2014 at 04:26 PM.
    08 9n3 Polo GTI
    Mods: heaps

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    232
    LCA bushes, who's using what-20140719_150035-jpg
    This is the installation sheet from SuperPro
    Judging from the part numbers there are just 2 bushes 3271 and 3273
    The 3 settings are achieved by using different combinations of the 2 bushes
    ie SPF3271K(standard) = 3271 + 3271
    SPF3272K(caster) = 3273 + 3271
    SPF3273K(anti lift) = 3273 + 3273

    I got the SPF3273K one installed, come around and give it a try if you like
    06 Polo TDi

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    535
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Yes I alluded to that on the previous page. What confused me was superpro market the 3273 pair as increased castor as well and I can't see how they achieve it. Anti lift, sure, but both not so.
    08 9n3 Polo GTI
    Mods: heaps

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,215
    Users Country Flag
    The only time you would use the "SPF3272K(caster) = 3273 + 3271" combination is if you had a gross lack of castor on the LHS and needed to correct it with an offset bushe. I'd be looking at subframe misalignment before I corrected something with an odd set of bushes though. If your alignment figures are all ok the only decision you need to make is if you'll run a set of offsets or a set of non-offsets.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    232
    Quote Originally Posted by rgvlee View Post
    Yes I alluded to that on the previous page. What confused me was superpro market the 3273 pair as increased castor as well and I can't see how they achieve it. Anti lift, sure, but both not so.
    Didn't mean to ignore your post there but I have a strange ability to occasionally jump over some posts without knowing(some kind of disorder? lol)

    As a result of not asking for the alignment data printout every time I do alignments, I don't even know what the standard caster on the Polo is
    But the caster with the anti-lift set installed on mine (eccentric part pointing down) is around 4°if that halps

    Or like what sambb said, 45°outward from the anti-lift position
    Technically this would not give you the full caster effect nor full anti-lift effect but you get both
    Last edited by TDIfan; 20-07-2014 at 05:18 AM.
    06 Polo TDi

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    535
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Fair enough sambb. I was getting a bit confused with all the offset talk going on as to what people were actually running; i.e., the single offset/single standard setup or double offset 'anti lift' setup. I was referring to the offset kit as the one with the single offset bush hence a bit of confusion my end on interpreting opinions.

    I'll fit up the 3273 anti-lift bushes and either run them at neutral or 45. Seems I'm not the only one to think running them at 45 should give a bit of both worlds.
    08 9n3 Polo GTI
    Mods: heaps

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Tweed Heads
    Posts
    955
    Hoyhoy.

    O.K. What's the flavour for the front bushes these days, I just spent the day with a go-pro underneath, & it looks like the front ones are shot.(these are custom 95 endure from Fulcrum, but a few years old.)
    I was very surprised @ how good the Seat rear bushes are on the video.
    I'm thinking of going back to the stock VW ones as they are solid rubber.
    I also have in the back of my little brain of doing something solid in the way of some sort of bearing involved.
    Please any comments appreciated.
    Hooroo.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    568
    Users Country Flag
    After Gav changed a few things on polo last weekend he noticed my LCA's were ones he nor I had seen before. They're red, unlike others purple or yellow ones. Not sure on brand as they weren't installed while I've owned the car but it's definitely not the standard ones as Gav said. Anyone else have red ones or seen them for sale? Just curious which brand they are
    2006 GTI Polo - Big Turbo Build - Louis19's Build Thread

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    3,178
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddy View Post
    I also have in the back of my little brain of doing something solid in the way of some sort of bearing involved.
    These are supposed to work very well for cars with an upright rear LCA bush (eg MkIV Golf and 6N and 6R Polo). Not sure if they make a version for horizontal bushes like ours.
    Resident grumpy old fart
    VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |