KO3S VS K04 Why upgrade?

[VWindahouse]

It was a great exercise for comparison and research purposes!

Same day and back to back DYNO's (same ambient temps) with the same operators. And all the info you supplied Kenny is true and correct

[h100vw]

It was a great exercise for comparison and research purposes!

Same day and back to back DYNO's (same ambient temps) with the same operators. And all the info you supplied Kenny is true and correct

Anthony's car had the basic Phase 2 loaded on Saturday morning. This is the same point that we started with on Shane's car.

After taking logs of the boost and lambda that were acceptable, we added more timing with the Custom Settings utility. Until the ECU reacted to there being too much and began pulling some back.

I think that with a bit longer to adapt in the car and some extra timing, Anthonys car will produce closer numbers to Shane's.

I don't know that all the 20hp difference is down to the LWFW but I would say that it is responsible for the steep gradient on Shane's plot compared to the other 2 Polo's.

Kenny's plot was pretty 'plump' in the mid range and that has to be the K04.

I did think that the mk5s would have been further ahead of the Polo's. 2 litre engines and 200hp to begin with.

I don't doubt there would be a few more horses in your engine Kenny, with a bit of fine tuning.

Gavin

[Jmac]

Without doubt Anthonys car will be up around there, considering it was reloaded 40 mins before its run it did very well IMO. Ask him at the end of the week how it is. With some of the other thigs that has been done to the car in the way of chassis and brake man itll handle something serious. Putting that power on the ground is the big thing , all you Pog pilots will agree with that.
It was great to see 3 Pogs together for comparisons sake. All were run straight after each other thanks to the operator for that. So temps werent in question, it was very interesting to see the drops on the 2nd and 3rd runs with the heatsoak.
Jmac