hey bigman, yes the look is similar (polo is better looking) and unfortunatly they only come in 3 door in OZ.
thats correct 3dr only and only come in manual..
thats okay - its an easy mistake to make![]()
hey bigman, yes the look is similar (polo is better looking) and unfortunatly they only come in 3 door in OZ.
mate go the ford xr4 or are they only 3dr
hell id go the ralliart colt over swift
Look at one of the 2 Fiat cars with the T-Jet engine. Ritmo? They are under 30k I think.
FWIW, I'd rather walk on my hands than own another Suzuki Swift Sport. Rubbish car.
They're also manual only, anyway.
Cheers!
PogoAmy.
November 2006 i bought my car, not options, 26k flat driveaway. Was basement price back then without the dealer going into holdback.
My red pocket rocket
i third this notion. it looks to be made of such cheap parts (well...it is suzuki) that are about to fall off all over the road. the car also looks out of proportion and does not appear to sit well on the road. throw a 1.6L N/A 4CYL in it (far from a 'sports' engine) and you have an underpowered japanese bodykit on wheels.
JUST MY TWO PSI !!
don't tell Mitch_GTI this....he used to work for suzuki and loves these things![]()
2010 Reflex Silver MK6 Golf GTI
Sunroof - MDI - Superchip - 19" VMR V710 - Kuhmo Ecsta SPT KU31 - VW Racing Panel Filter
As a Suzuki Swift GTi owner from '89 (the original squairsh car - and loved it to bits), can I state that Suzies have a deserved reputation as been unbreakable, simple cars that are great value for money.
I drove the Sport when working out what to buy and will say it was dissapointing - it should have been a better car.
However it is not the worst thing on wheels.
If I didn't buy the Polo, Ralliart Colt would have been next. Compromised in some areas but fun - and handles better than the Polo.
Bookmarks