Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Downhill with cruise control

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    sunshine coast
    Posts
    1,194

    hmm sounds like transmission kicking into me. just gears slowing you down.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    867
    Quote Originally Posted by gregozedobe View Post
    I think I might have a different opinion to what you seem to be implying ie :

    It is cheaper to use only your brakes rather than your engine and gears to help slow you down.

    IMHO using engine braking sympathetically is unlikely to prematurely wear out a transmission. It certainly hasn't for any of the 11 vehicles I've had for the last 37 years, and I did keep them most of them for long enough to notice if it was going to be a problem. And I don't recall any of my acquaintences needing to repair (let alone replace a complete) transmission because of engine breaking.

    In fact, apart from outright abuse causing damage, the main issue I've seen with transmissions in recent years is people using top gear too much to tow heavy trailers using cars/vans with "weak" top gears (eg Turbo diesel Landcruisers, Bedford vans). Even there, it has been (admittedly expensive) bearing and shaft repairs, not totally new gearboxes.

    Even VW's latest u-beaut DSG gearboxes do down shifts to provide engine braking to slow you down, so VW's transmission engineers must be pretty comfortable with the idea.

    So some related questions for you :

    How many examples of premature wear have you seen on manual transmissions that can definitively be blamed on using engine braking, and what percentage is that (of total worn manual transmissions) you've seen ?

    How many of these have required a complete new transmission, rather than replacement/repair of the worn components only ?
    OK to be honest, I've been told this in relation to driving on the track where the wear on all parts is much higher then on the road. They say it's much better at very high revs on the track when you are punishing your car to use the brakes and not the engine/transmission. So you're probably right, on the road it prob makes fark all difference.

    aus liebe zum automobil

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    867

    Quote Originally Posted by T Go View Post
    Isnt this just abit more simple than what every1 is makin out 2 be?
    When you lift your foot off the accelerator, dont you lose speed?
    Thats all the car is doin in cruise control when its downhill, isnt it???

    I dont think braking, electronics etc etc would come into it....
    ummm you don't lose speed if CC is active and you remove your foot from the accelerator ??? That's the point of CC.

    Quote Originally Posted by mozzzy_2000 View Post
    Yeah its certianly an interesting effect but I'm also pretty sure its just using the engine to slow down much like downshifting to slow down. But when I first noticed it it did feel like braking. However you only get this effect upto a certain point. Once the incline is steep enough gravity takes over and the effect is lost and you quickly gain speed. Once that happens you realise its not applying the brakes. Would be a pretty cool feature if it did do that tho.
    This is exactly what I've experienced. It DOES try to slow you down, but going down a really steep hill there is nothing stopping you except brakes.

    aus liebe zum automobil

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |