Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51

Thread: Disable ESP

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    697

    I know the conventional wisdom is to turn it off and maximise power and performance. Everytime I turn it off, I get much slower times bc I just get wheelspin, eg .7sec slower 1/4 mile, non-stop wheel-spin coming out of cnrs on race tracks until I hit 3rd. With it on, sure - there is a degree of compromise, and I can detect it cutting off torque/power etc, but without it - all the car would be good for is burn-out comps.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    867
    Quote Originally Posted by pomme View Post
    Alright, easy test. Next time its wet, find a nice open space... don't have to be going fast... give it abit of a scandinavian flick... the back end will start coming round, then sort itself out, every time. Whenever the back steps out you hear the back brakes going... the car straightens up, and all is right with the world.

    Something is sorting it out... and it isn't the driver. Cause i can't control brakes individually.
    ahhh ok. Well I did a skid pan day the other week, and mostly used the handbrake for oversteer. But on the couple of times I tried a scando flick it didn't work as well, but that could have been my lack of skill

    aus liebe zum automobil

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by GT3 View Post
    I know the conventional wisdom is to turn it off and maximise power and performance. Everytime I turn it off, I get much slower times bc I just get wheelspin, eg .7sec slower 1/4 mile, non-stop wheel-spin coming out of cnrs on race tracks until I hit 3rd. With it on, sure - there is a degree of compromise, and I can detect it cutting off torque/power etc, but without it - all the car would be good for is burn-out comps.
    Sorry dude if you are good with the throttle you will always be quicker than ESP cutting power. Same way you can stop quicker without using ABS (Well, some people can with alot of practice in controlled conditions)

    Mashing the throttle coming out of a corner on a high power, high torque, lightweight front wheel drive car is a very silly thing to do if you are trying to go quickly.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    697
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVeReIgN View Post
    Mashing the throttle coming out of a corner on a high power, high torque, lightweight front wheel drive car is a very silly thing to do if you are trying to go quickly.
    Your analogy about ABS is interesting, and true applying the brakes to threshold levels prior to ABS kicking in is the way to do it. But preventing the wheels from spinning in testing conditions such as a flying lap, particularly with massive deceleration coming into a difficult and tricky tight bend, then powering back into a straight isn't as delicate a procedure as you describe. The car is running at very high RPMS and the threshold between the wheels spinning and keeping grip can be very narrow. In most instances, you can avoid ESP kicking in - but having it there to retart spin in the early stages when it occurs can work well. Trying to recover momentum after the wheels lose traction will cost you time.

    So Dave, how long have you been racing cars? any best times?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by GT3 View Post
    Your analogy about ABS is interesting, and true applying the brakes to threshold levels prior to ABS kicking in is the way to do it. But preventing the wheels from spinning in testing conditions such as a flying lap, particularly with massive deceleration coming into a difficult and tricky tight bend, then powering back into a straight isn't as delicate a procedure as you describe. The car is running at very high RPMS and the threshold between the wheels spinning and keeping grip can be very narrow. In most instances, you can avoid ESP kicking in - but having it there to retart spin in the early stages when it occurs can work well. Trying to recover momentum after the wheels lose traction will cost you time.

    So Dave, how long have you been racing cars? any best times?

    My track experience is irrelevant - You say you run slower lap times with ESP off because you spin the entire way through 2nd and into third coming out of a corner - This says to me you're just mashing the throttle and when ESP is on you're relying on it to keep you in line.

    I'm not saying it isn't a fine art, but you'll be quicker. ESP is a safety aide not a racing aide.

    Also - Not sure how the Polo's ESP works, but its either going to be using the brakes (Not what you want on the track) or cutting the throttle (Not what you want on a turbo car trying to keep a turbo spinning)

    Cheers,
    Dave

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    697
    Neither situation is perfect, with or without it on, there will be compromises. If your running serious power in a light FWD, there will be an increased likelihood that the tyres will break traction (specially chipped Polo GTIs). My point is that you can work with the ESP, but if traction is not an issue, sure, switch it off, why wouldn't you?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by junior View Post
    I was under the impression that any car that wanted to meet the 5 Star ANCAP safety standard must have ESP.
    That's from next year's ANCAP requirements (FINALLY!!). The "mandatory" I'm speaking of is the one that says you can't sell a car without seatbelts. Seeing that ESP is the biggest safety invention since the belt this makes perfect sense (well to me at least).

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Funkdancer View Post
    That's from next year's ANCAP requirements (FINALLY!!). The "mandatory" I'm speaking of is the one that says you can't sell a car without seatbelts. Seeing that ESP is the biggest safety invention since the belt this makes perfect sense (well to me at least).
    I don't agree with it being mandatory.

    It costs a royal ****load create an ESP program - FPV and HSV haven't had it for a while because I read somewhere bosch need 3 or 4 cars (of each model) for a year and something rediculous like 5 million dollars per model to add the program into their ECU.

    Means that
    a) Cost of cars goes up, especially lower volume models - Manufacturers aren't going to let the cost eat into their profit margin
    b) Many lower volume models will cease to exist
    c) We have incrased international platform sharing. (ie - Daewoo Lacetti being rebadged as Holden Epica) - Whether that is a good or bad thing you decide - I just prefer abit of variety in the market - I will be dissapointed come the day that each manufacturer has mabye ~5 models worldwide.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    150
    Sovereign, Wheels wrote that in a car that has 4 channel ABS, the additional cost is about $200 for e.g. the Bosch ESP module.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043

    Quote Originally Posted by Funkdancer View Post
    Sovereign, Wheels wrote that in a car that has 4 channel ABS, the additional cost is about $200 for e.g. the Bosch ESP module.
    The $$$ figure will depend on the amount of cars the developing cost is spread across..

    It might cost $200 on a Camry which is going to sell hundreds of thousands of units.. But what will it cost for a car that isn't so popular..?

    And is that figure just the module or does it factor in programming etc?

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |