I know the conventional wisdom is to turn it off and maximise power and performance. Everytime I turn it off, I get much slower times bc I just get wheelspin, eg .7sec slower 1/4 mile, non-stop wheel-spin coming out of cnrs on race tracks until I hit 3rd. With it on, sure - there is a degree of compromise, and I can detect it cutting off torque/power etc, but without it - all the car would be good for is burn-out comps.
Sorry dude if you are good with the throttle you will always be quicker than ESP cutting power. Same way you can stop quicker without using ABS (Well, some people can with alot of practice in controlled conditions)
Mashing the throttle coming out of a corner on a high power, high torque, lightweight front wheel drive car is a very silly thing to do if you are trying to go quickly.![]()
Your analogy about ABS is interesting, and true applying the brakes to threshold levels prior to ABS kicking in is the way to do it. But preventing the wheels from spinning in testing conditions such as a flying lap, particularly with massive deceleration coming into a difficult and tricky tight bend, then powering back into a straight isn't as delicate a procedure as you describe. The car is running at very high RPMS and the threshold between the wheels spinning and keeping grip can be very narrow. In most instances, you can avoid ESP kicking in - but having it there to retart spin in the early stages when it occurs can work well. Trying to recover momentum after the wheels lose traction will cost you time.
So Dave, how long have you been racing cars? any best times?
My track experience is irrelevant - You say you run slower lap times with ESP off because you spin the entire way through 2nd and into third coming out of a corner - This says to me you're just mashing the throttle and when ESP is on you're relying on it to keep you in line.
I'm not saying it isn't a fine art, but you'll be quicker. ESP is a safety aide not a racing aide.
Also - Not sure how the Polo's ESP works, but its either going to be using the brakes (Not what you want on the track) or cutting the throttle (Not what you want on a turbo car trying to keep a turbo spinning)
Cheers,
Dave
Neither situation is perfect, with or without it on, there will be compromises. If your running serious power in a light FWD, there will be an increased likelihood that the tyres will break traction (specially chipped Polo GTIs). My point is that you can work with the ESP, but if traction is not an issue, sure, switch it off, why wouldn't you?
I don't agree with it being mandatory.
It costs a royal ****load create an ESP program - FPV and HSV haven't had it for a while because I read somewhere bosch need 3 or 4 cars (of each model) for a year and something rediculous like 5 million dollars per model to add the program into their ECU.
Means that
a) Cost of cars goes up, especially lower volume models - Manufacturers aren't going to let the cost eat into their profit margin
b) Many lower volume models will cease to exist
c) We have incrased international platform sharing. (ie - Daewoo Lacetti being rebadged as Holden Epica) - Whether that is a good or bad thing you decide - I just prefer abit of variety in the market - I will be dissapointed come the day that each manufacturer has mabye ~5 models worldwide.
Sovereign, Wheels wrote that in a car that has 4 channel ABS, the additional cost is about $200 for e.g. the Bosch ESP module.
The $$$ figure will depend on the amount of cars the developing cost is spread across..
It might cost $200 on a Camry which is going to sell hundreds of thousands of units.. But what will it cost for a car that isn't so popular..?
And is that figure just the module or does it factor in programming etc?
Bookmarks