Support VWWC

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Buying a 9N GTI

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    419

    Funny how times change. I remember when the GTI moniker stood for small car, large engine, manual transmission, etc

    Nowadays people want it to be some sort of GT (Grand Tourer) style car - auto/DSG, small economical engine, refined suspension, etc

    All a bit of a shame really

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    434
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by DeanB View Post
    Funny how times change. I remember when the GTI moniker stood for small car, large engine, manual transmission, etc

    Nowadays people want it to be some sort of GT (Grand Tourer) style car - auto/DSG, small economical engine, refined suspension, etc

    All a bit of a shame really
    True, the new GTI is practically a girls car now

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by hibijibis View Post
    hmm. interesting. does anyone know roughly what the 0-100 is on a tuned 1.8?
    Best i've ever seen anyone manage is around the 6.2s mark.... and that was a fantastic launch and shifts.

    Realistically, I'd expect most normal drivers to manage between 6.5 and 7.0 to 100km/h (most of that being eaten up with loss of traction thanks to the lack of LSD)

    Quote Originally Posted by DeanB View Post
    Funny how times change. I remember when the GTI moniker stood for small car, large engine, manual transmission, etc

    Nowadays people want it to be some sort of GT (Grand Tourer) style car - auto/DSG, small economical engine, refined suspension, etc

    All a bit of a shame really
    You're just looking for a hot hatch from the wrong manufacturer. I made the switch to a real hot hatch and I've never looked back. Sure, I get flogged on the straights, particularly if I'm not in the right gear at the right time.... but this car brings *so* much more of a smile to my face than the Polo ever managed.
    Last edited by break; 22-11-2010 at 07:30 PM.
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    And what was the price tag?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    419
    Quote Originally Posted by noone View Post
    And what was the price tag?
    He won't have got change from $30k for a brand new one ....

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by break View Post
    (most of that being eaten up with loss of traction thanks to the lack of LSD)
    Clio Sports are certainly nice cars - however, LSD limiting the 0-100km/h is wrong. The traction is an issue with FWD, not due to lack of LSD.
    06 Polo GTI - REVO Stage 2 = 140kw @ wheels.
    06 Golf GTI - Bluefin Stage 1 blacked out with ED30 theme, leather, xenon, etc.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,297
    Quote Originally Posted by break View Post
    You're just looking for a hot hatch from the wrong manufacturer. I made the switch to a real hot hatch and I've never looked back. Sure, I get flogged on the straights, particularly if I'm not in the right gear at the right time.... but this car brings *so* much more of a smile to my face than the Polo ever managed.
    The two cars are chalk and cheese for the desired purpose/intention, for solely fun factor you are absolutely correct, the clio is great, on the track it is simply better than the lightly modded polo could ever want to be. But for daily driving where comfort, NVH, gear shift feel and steering weight (bear in mind I refer to a daily), the Polo is better suited to that.

    How many Clio's did you look at till you found one that you would own? I looked at 4 and gave up, a mate was onto his 5th when he bought it in Townsville (and will now sell it cos he bought a Golf GTI cos the clio was too uncomfortable for daily commuting).

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UMG Brisbane
    Posts
    507
    Oi, I heard that.
    Agree with what Sean says, and not with Break. Never had launch limited by a LSD, but that is not the 172/182's strong point anyway.
    The build quality and finish is definitely in favour of the polo though.
    Al..

    HTC rocks
    2013 MY13.5 Passat V6 Highline Wagon. Watch this space
    GONE:2017 MY18 Skoda RS169 Wagon w/ Tech & Lux, 2007 VW MKV Golf GTi

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by insanekiwi View Post
    Clio Sports are certainly nice cars - however, LSD limiting the 0-100km/h is wrong. The traction is an issue with FWD, not due to lack of LSD.
    You haven't driven a FWD with a proper LSD setup (new Focus RS is a great example). It makes up for most of the problems at the power levels we are talking about.

    Quote Originally Posted by seangti View Post
    The two cars are chalk and cheese for the desired purpose/intention, for solely fun factor you are absolutely correct, the clio is great, on the track it is simply better than the lightly modded polo could ever want to be. But for daily driving where comfort, NVH, gear shift feel and steering weight (bear in mind I refer to a daily), the Polo is better suited to that.

    How many Clio's did you look at till you found one that you would own? I looked at 4 and gave up, a mate was onto his 5th when he bought it in Townsville (and will now sell it cos he bought a Golf GTI cos the clio was too uncomfortable for daily commuting).
    Oh I absolutely agree that the Polo is miles ahead when it comes to the daily commute. It has the torque where you need it, firm but supple ride, nice light steering, nice light clutch, and a decent seat position.

    But yeah, I actually bought the first Clio I saw (well, I looked at a few... and made an offer on the one I saw first). Yes, they are French and suffer typical French build quality.... but as I said, it's not the point of the Clio. As a hot hatch around the mountains they are sublime.... doing just about everything else they are compromised.

    But the question is what do you want more in a sports car? I know what I prefer... but I also know that that doesn't suit 90% of buyers.
    Last edited by break; 23-11-2010 at 08:46 PM.
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    269
    Users Country Flag

    Very different cars. The frenchies sure do handle sublimely (i've had a few), but for now i am addicted to boost in my Pogo.
    MY2008 VW Polo GTi / GIAC Tune / Forge FMIC / Forge 007 DV / N75 Race / BMC OTA / KW V1 Coilovers / Whiteline Front&Rear Swaybars + Toe-In Shim / Weichers Front&Rear Strut Braces / Full Non-Res Milltek Exhaust / 17" Bora Sport

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |