Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 61

Thread: Brisbane Polo Dyno Day Results - 25 August 2012

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,344

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharkie View Post
    Eddy's K04 Polo, still the king, has all bolt on performance parts that can be fitted in a single day. No engine performance tuning has been done in over 4 years.
    Well done Eddy

    Not for long lol
    MODS- TOO MANY

  2. #32
    Hope that's clear enough.




    Just to give it a bit more perspective, the maximum difference between Jason and your requested boost is .6 psi.
    Last edited by s4mmie; 27-08-2012 at 11:53 AM.
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag
    Legend! Cheers mate

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    4,016
    Users Country Flag
    Wow, way to run a comprehensive Dyno and data collection guys, world class stuff. A template for future dyno comparisons!!
    2014 Skoda Yeti TDI Outdoor 4x4 | Audi Q3 CFGC repower | Darkside tune and Race Cams | Darkside dump pDPF | Wagner Comp IC | Snow Water Meth | Bilstein B6 H&R springs | Rays Homura 2x7 18 x 8" 255 Potenza Sports | Golf R subframe | Superpro sways and bushings | 034 engine mounts | MK6 GTI brakes |

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,344
    What was with the MK4 GTI Stg3 making a low 153.554kw, but a huge torque number 396.328
    MODS- TOO MANY

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag
    Maybe that's a reflection of the small port 1.8t v's the large port?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,344
    Quote Originally Posted by VWindahouse View Post
    Maybe that's a reflection of the small port 1.8t v's the large port?
    Bigger turbo with less power but more torque
    MODS- TOO MANY

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,850
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by vwthunder View Post
    What was with the MK4 GTI Stg3 making a low 153.554kw, but a huge torque number 396.328
    Lito, has a Frankenturbo with CC. AFR (Air fuel ratio) was dangerously low. Tried 3 runs each aborted when AFR went to 1.2 ... 1.3. Finally decided to risk it and do a run that was also aborted at 4500rmin. Guy and James was not willing to have the engine self-destruct in their workshop .....

    So it made 153kw at 4500rmin with no idea as to what it would make if allowed to run out to 6500rmin. It was a clear indication of (a lot) more tuning needed .... .... Good torque though.

    Lito can post the graphs up if he wishes. Extra graphs showing the AFR was done for him.

    Also now the reason I will not go Frankenturbo ....
    Current: 2023 MY23 T-Roc R Lapiz Blue + Beats Audio + Black pack 2018 MY19 Golf R manual Lapiz Blue + DAP) 2018 MY18 Golf 110TSI (150TSI) Trendline manual White2014 Amarok TSI Red (tuned over 200kw + lots of extras) 2013 Up! manual Red 2017 Polo GTI manual Black Previous VWs and some others ...

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,850
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    For those that want to know what the AFR is about see this graph:

    All t

    All the data above are showing Lambda figures ....
    Current: 2023 MY23 T-Roc R Lapiz Blue + Beats Audio + Black pack 2018 MY19 Golf R manual Lapiz Blue + DAP) 2018 MY18 Golf 110TSI (150TSI) Trendline manual White2014 Amarok TSI Red (tuned over 200kw + lots of extras) 2013 Up! manual Red 2017 Polo GTI manual Black Previous VWs and some others ...

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Mexico
    Posts
    8,979
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharkie View Post
    Lito, has a Frankenturbo with CC. AFR (Air fuel ratio) was dangerously low. Tried 3 runs each aborted when AFR went to 1.2 ... 1.3. Finally decided to risk it and do a run that was also aborted at 4500rmin.
    I am keeping quiet, until this has been investigated. Not what I have in logs with the wideband from during the tuning, as I wouldn't want melted pistons on my conscience either. To be honest it was running rich then if anything.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |