Support VWWC

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 61

Thread: Brisbane Polo Dyno Day Results - 25 August 2012

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058

    Thanks to Guy for this, hoping he may have some feedback / comments from what he saw.
    Nice to see that the results were largely on par with expectations and that the mods do add up.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bentleigh East, Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    492
    Guy, your views on what you saw?
    Polo 9n3 GTI

  3. #23
    I didn't see anything ground breaking or surprising.

    From memory, some people were pushing the K03 turbo outside what we would call safe limits on boost (but I have to look up the boost levels off the dyno to check) and obviously that shows up on the power.

    Saying that, K03's are now cheaper than they were 5 years ago, and nobody is really holding these cars WOT on the track all day, so it's a small trade off.

    I'll try to pull the ambient temps off the dyno for the Polo boys too:


    Quote Originally Posted by Guy_H View Post
    One factor you need to put in the figures (that had not been calculated) is the ambient temperature.

    First run at 9-00am we had an ambient of 17 degrees, at 1-00PM we had an ambient of 24.5 degrees. So the cars run later had a disadvantage of almost 8 degrees celcius.

    If you used different dyno correction figures (which we chose not to), the cars run at a hotter ambient may have had an extra 3 - 4 % more power and torque added rather than that of the ones run earlier (they may have been normalised down 3 or 4 %).

    This obviously has a great bearing on the results, INCLUDING the ability for the intercooler to do its job.

    Taking donations for a temperature controlled dyno room - $750,000 should cover it

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Albury, NSW
    Posts
    741
    Users Country Flag
    Really awesome information guys - such a great job! So much data to take in. I'm surprised the Forge IC came up tops after we've all been dismissing it recently. Also should get a Dyno day in Albury - hasn't made it past 10 degrees for the past week or so - so frickin cold!
    2019 132TSI Tiguan
    2011 Audi S4 Wagon
    1988 MK1 Caddy
    2006 Polo GTI

  5. #25
    Just thought I'd post these. I did them up for leitch and myselfs car because we had comparable mods.
    You can see the crazy difference in temps with leitch's forge v my stock FMIC.

    Boost is in PSI, Temp in deg C and RPM at the bottom.
    <EDIT> Added everyone elses.











    Last edited by s4mmie; 27-08-2012 at 11:32 AM.
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Mexico
    Posts
    8,979
    Users Country Flag

  7. #27
    Done
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag
    Thanks mate! So just to confirm these graphs represent the first recorded runs?

  9. #29
    Yeah mate, all first run graphs. From what I gathered on the day and from looking over the run data, everyone made the most power on the first run. From there, everyone made a little more peak boost and intake temps went up but no increase in power.
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag

    Nice one bud, cheers! Would it be too much to ask to overlap Jason and my results?

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |