4motion setup

[Jmac]

Mmm, what about scrapping the IRS rear altogether and sticking with the beam rear axle?
Two arms to hold the diff on.


Or a DeDion tube setup. It's a sort of hybrid IRS/beam. You can see the basic principle here --






The more I see it, the more I like it.
The rear diff fixes to the body and the 'beam' connects the two arms around the diff.

i really like that set up too man but put that into practice in the small 9N3, not so sure
Keep it comin guys
Jmac

[s4mmie]

Cross Polo is still 2WD

This is a bit more conventional, no inboard brakes, smaller tube --





Can't you just see it in there Jimmy

[seangti]

Sounds like a nightmare. From my Subaru days, a WRX or Forester with STI engine, brakes, complete drive train does make it an STI. I've driven (on a skid pan) a 07 Forester fitted with all STI running gear, an 02 WRX and 03 STI back to back, the difference in performance is simply not comparable with the STI smashing em both for power down ability and cornering predictability. My point, adding bits that aren't designed to be there doesn't necessarily make it better to drive. Think RenaultSport Clio V6 (rear drive), awesome in theory, but in reality it was bugger all quicker than the FWD.

With all the added weight and complexity (assuming it could even fit), means needing more power to get the same outcome as FWD only.

Start with a MKIV R32 and work out how to dress it like a polo, haha

[team_v]

To be honest with the amount of money you would be spending you might as well just buy a Westfield or if you want more a Caterham kit.