Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: 4motion setup

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Eltham, Victoria
    Posts
    1,037
    Users Country Flag

    What about the Cross Polo chassis?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ringwood, Victoria
    Posts
    4,140

    4motion setup

    Or a modified watts linkage maybe?

    Stage 2+ Intercooler Carbon Intake Downpipe Swaybar DV+ Remsa.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dont poke and hope, scan, smoke and scope
    Posts
    4,423
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by spraycanmansam View Post
    Mmm, what about scrapping the IRS rear altogether and sticking with the beam rear axle?
    Two arms to hold the diff on.


    Or a DeDion tube setup. It's a sort of hybrid IRS/beam. You can see the basic principle here --






    The more I see it, the more I like it.
    The rear diff fixes to the body and the 'beam' connects the two arms around the diff.
    i really like that set up too man but put that into practice in the small 9N3, not so sure
    Keep it comin guys
    Jmac
    Alba European
    Service, Diagnostics and repairs. Mobile Diag available on request
    Audi/VW/Porsche Factory trained tech 25+ yrs exp
    For people who value experience call 0423965341

  4. #14
    Cross Polo is still 2WD

    This is a bit more conventional, no inboard brakes, smaller tube --





    Can't you just see it in there Jimmy
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,297
    Sounds like a nightmare. From my Subaru days, a WRX or Forester with STI engine, brakes, complete drive train does make it an STI. I've driven (on a skid pan) a 07 Forester fitted with all STI running gear, an 02 WRX and 03 STI back to back, the difference in performance is simply not comparable with the STI smashing em both for power down ability and cornering predictability. My point, adding bits that aren't designed to be there doesn't necessarily make it better to drive. Think RenaultSport Clio V6 (rear drive), awesome in theory, but in reality it was bugger all quicker than the FWD.

    With all the added weight and complexity (assuming it could even fit), means needing more power to get the same outcome as FWD only.

    Start with a MKIV R32 and work out how to dress it like a polo, haha
    Track Car: 06 Polo GTI Red Devil mkII
    Daily: 2010 VW Jetta Highline
    Gone but not forgotten: 08 Polo GTI
    ** All information I provide is probably incorrect until validated by someone else **

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    To be honest with the amount of money you would be spending you might as well just buy a Westfield or if you want more a Caterham kit.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    This would be an epic project.

    For me, I'd just buy a Quattro TT and you've got much the same hardware in a better designed chassis for less...

    Still, I'd kiss your feet in worship if you got it done.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Albury, NSW
    Posts
    741
    Users Country Flag
    I can certainly help you with parts too
    2019 132TSI Tiguan
    2011 Audi S4 Wagon
    1988 MK1 Caddy
    2006 Polo GTI

  9. #19
    Good to know NP

    If you just bought a Quattro TT or Golf you'd just have a run-of-the-mill Golf or Audi, where's the fun in that?
    That said, this is all just a hypothetical at the moment. I think realistically money would be better spent on a LSD and getting everything setup correctly.

    Learning that the Polo R is not going to be AWD gave me serious sad face.. and unless I suddenly start to like the Mk7 Golf, I see myself keeping the Polo for a while. May as well do something worthwhile with it
    Can you imagine a 2.0L stroker with a GT2860 or the like and AWD in 1100kg?




    Anyways..

    Doing a bit more research, IRS v DeDion seems a hot topic with the Lotus and Caterham boys. General consensus is that a DeDion tube setup will be lighter, cheaper, easier to setup and give 98% results of an IRS getup. Sounds pretty good.

    A custom rear subframe bolted between the rear chassis rails, rubber mount the diff, coilovers where the shocks are now...
    Not sure on what hubs I'd use though...
    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

  10. #20

    Polo GTI MY2008
    Build Thread
    136.09kW and 305.28Nm torques, Dynapack Hub Dyno

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |