Support VWWC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 2.5" or 3" Turbo Back Exhaust for POLO? ANY RECOMMENDATIONS!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lynbrook, Victoria
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag

    2.5" or 3" Turbo Back Exhaust for POLO? ANY RECOMMENDATIONS!

    hey everyone, just wanted to hear your thoughts on the 2.5" or 3" Turbo Back Exhaust for POLO GTI's?
    from what ive heard with these smaller engines there is a possibility of loosing some power if the exhaust is too big (3"). so which would have a greater gain the 2.5" or 3"?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    sunshine coast
    Posts
    1,194
    2.5 is more then ample for the ko3s and k04. if your a bigger turbo build ie garret, then gains have been made with the 3'.
    " I wait I resolution derive pleasure this " latest spammer post

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lynbrook, Victoria
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by mikepologti View Post
    2.5 is more then ample for the ko3s and k04. if your a bigger turbo build ie garret, then gains have been made with the 3'.
    however will i experience any loss of power if i go with the 3"? because if not, i may just stick with it for the deeper grunt! =D
    by the way im only running the stock K03

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,440
    3" dump and 2.5" catback sounds good to me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lynbrook, Victoria
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by peedman View Post
    3" dump and 2.5" catback sounds good to me.
    hrm..so will i experience more gains with the 2" or 3" if im runing the K03 and i dont think ill be upgrading in future. my appologies if i appear to be repeating the question. id just like a better understanding and a clear answer. if they produce the same gains. Ill be going with the 3" only because
    ill get a better sound from it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,440
    i dont think there is any harm in going bigger, u want a less restrictive dowpipe so the gases can exit as fast as possible. that being said 2.5" might be sufficient for a k03 but with the price difference between 2.5" and 3" downpipe bugger all, i would get a 3" dumppipe.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Mexico
    Posts
    8,979
    Users Country Flag
    A full 3 inch system will be boomy. 3 inch DP and 2.5 system is a good compromise. I don't think there's a great deal wrong with the std system TBH.

    Gavin

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    There is a few threads on the dump pipe and exhausts. General consensus is that the dump pipe has a little restriction, but not a lot after that.

    Full exhaust is not a good bang for buck mod. If you are after a particular sound, try the Polo UK site as they are more likely to have off the shelf systems and they've posted a few videos for your ref.

    There was some talk of 3" dump loosing low end torque, but others with 3" have not had this issue... read read read, hopefully help you make your mind up.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lynbrook, Victoria
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by noone View Post
    There is a few threads on the dump pipe and exhausts. General consensus is that the dump pipe has a little restriction, but not a lot after that.

    Full exhaust is not a good bang for buck mod. If you are after a particular sound, try the Polo UK site as they are more likely to have off the shelf systems and they've posted a few videos for your ref.

    There was some talk of 3" dump loosing low end torque, but others with 3" have not had this issue... read read read, hopefully help you make your mind up.
    i think this option might cost quite expensive as it needs to be delivered from UK + labour on top of that. The reason i going after the turbo back is
    because of this group buy going around, so i thought it might be a good opportunity where i can make a few savings. =D
    by the way could you post me a link of these clips, it would be good to see the sound of these thigns.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    18
    Users Country Flag

    The diameter will have more effect on noise then power.

    To take andantage of the larger diameter you need to tune it specificaly for that size. I have never seen somebody that reduced their exhaust flow restriction that then coundnt make more power after being retuned.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |