The issue is your use of non-quantifiable things like "sleek" and "aerodynamic". Who here can say that these other cars ARE as "sleek" or "aerodynamic" as the Golf.
Also, in the past few weeks I've been in Suzukis, Fords, Audis, Mazdas and Peugots for various reasons. All had wind buffeting annoying enough for me to put the window up - so again - so in my experience I don't think manufacturers can make modern aerodynamic cars which don't have buffeting - but it's just my opinion, like your opinion is yours.
The reason for looking at the other "garbage" is because it is quantifiable data, rather than peoples opinions.
It's a fact that more than 95% of the cars I see have their windows up.
You can nit pick all you want, I'm sure that people do have their windows down at different times for a short period but it changes nothing and doesn't make my argument incorrect.No one has suggested that some people drive with their windows down all the time. That's obviously not true. However, Maverick has suggested that "the vast majority of drivers" drive with their windows up "all the time", ie. they never have their windows down while driving. Again, that is patently nonsense.
The majority of cars on the market now would suffer from buffeting under certain conditions, my Subaru did under some conditions, my Ford did under some conditions and the Golf does under some conditions. All can be alleviated by adjusting, opening another window and/or fitting a weathershield.The original post in this thread complained about buffeting when the windows are open. Whether that is for 5mins per year of driving or more is not the issue. The issue is that it happens a great deal (according to the original poster) in the Golf when other manufacturers can create designs that are still sleek but don't cause excessive buffeting.
Unless you can post some proof of your claim (which is really a casual observation based on third hand information from one poster being passed off as fact) that other manufacturers do not suffer from wind buffeting I would suggest that your posts are pointless as they don't contribute anything, at least others are discussing this based on valid data and experience.
website: www.my-gti.com
I only just saw this thread and the first thing I was going to say to the OP was "you've never driven a falcon" LOL
I've had BF, BFII and FG and they're all TERRIBLE and that is with the windows UP.
O/T... what do you guys actually test? The issues I've had with my latest FG have been so stupid it's laughable!
EDIT: LOL I've been away for a few days!
Last edited by dave_r; 24-05-2010 at 12:34 PM.
Don't get dave- started on Fords,
I thought the FGs were pretty good ?!
118TSI, DSG, Candy White, Sunroof, RCD510, Dynaudio, USB + iPod cable, Reversing Camera, Adaptive Chassis Control, Prem. Bluetooth, Fogs, Tint and Mats.
They are good... good for a Falcon
Bookmarks