Support VWWC

Page 9 of 26 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 260

Thread: What to buy? GTI or R20

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    323
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by G-rig View Post
    GTI stock is good value, but stock for stock the R32 is better and faster. Better handling & quality of drive, sounds better and more unique/cool.
    That's what I loved about the R32. It was amazing how much street cred (deserved or not) that thing attracted. I got so many guys coming up to me to talk about it. Especially when it was reviewed on Top Gear and whooped the 130i.

    I have to say though, I don't reckon the R looks that different to the GTI. Exhausts and that's it. The silver snout of the R32 at least helped a bit. The Ford Focus RS is so obviously not Nana's car, but the GTI and R just look almost too much like Sleepers. I hope my driving will give it away

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    What I mean with the MKV GTI vs MKV R32 debate is that you could purchase a MKV GTI and making it QUICKER than the R32 for less than the price of the R32. Whether you're a talented enough driver to pilot that GTI is another thing. There is no way that will be possible with the MK6 GTI vs R though.
    Yeah that's true but quicker isn't always better but would still be a bit of fun and agree that they are great value. Getting bigger numbers on the dyno is nice but doesn't really mean as much on the road with take offs and wheelspin etc.

    Another guy on GolfMKV got 14.4 in his R32 only mods being APR retune and Milltek catback so they aren't really slow just the power delivery is different.

    As backdoc says it's about the fun factor and overal package, just not which one is slightly faster. Also turn a lot of heads in the R, people love the sound and it's great seeing the look on peoples face when you tell them you got a V6 in a hatch. Big engines in small cars are cool.
    Last edited by G-rig; 19-01-2010 at 08:58 PM.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    114
    I guess as they are now both 2lT, it comes down to cost and awd vs fwd. I would guess 90% of people would prefer the awd? Sure you can easily mod a Gti to be quicker than a Mark V R32, but driving an over-powered fwd car isn't fun, it's scary. My mate could probably drive my 1998 magna quicker than I could drive my R32, but I'll bet u, I'm having more fun. If you want a serious performance car, get an awd or rwd period. fwd cars still have torque steer, they still understeer etc etc even the new generation of fwds e.g focus rs with their fancy revoknuckle suspension.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VIC
    Posts
    882
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed! View Post
    e.g focus rs with their fancy revoknuckle suspension.

    Or the mk6 with the XDL??

    Apparently the Focus and its fancy suspension is still not great for getting the power down.
    currrently... MY10 GTI | DSG | Candy White | Sunroof | 18's | BT | MDI
    previously... MY08 GT TDI | DSG | Reflex Silver | Sunroof

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed! View Post
    ... but driving an over-powered fwd car isn't fun, it's scary... fwd cars still have torque steer, they still understeer etc etc even the new generation of fwds e.g focus rs with their fancy revoknuckle suspension.
    Um... I'm taking it from these comments you haven't driven a VW Golf GTI.
    Even with 300KW of power and 515NM of torque they don't have torque steer!

    Don't believe me? Read this review of the APR SEMA Golf GTI (Stage III) by Motor Magazine. The writer went from "almost falling off my chair in hysterical laughter" at the idea of that much power going through FWD to proclaiming "There's bugger all torque steer. Bloody amazing".

    The reason is that unlike the cars you mentioned, the Golf GTI has equal length drive shafts between the front left and right wheels and is properly balanced etc.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    Um... I'm taking it from these comments you haven't driven a VW Golf GTI.
    Even with 300KW of power and 515NM of torque they don't have torque steer!
    Rubbish. My GTI torque steers. It's nowhere near as prominent as other high-powered FWD cars I've driven (like the Focus XR5, Mondeo XR5, Mazda 3 MPS and the previous GTI) but it's still there. When the drive and steering is shared by the same wheels, it's virtually impossible to extinguish entirely. When a FWD car experiences uneven grip on takeoff, it's going to scuttle sideways a little, simple as that. Fancy electronic trickery just reduces it.
    GTI MKVI Candy White | 5 door | DSG | ACC | 18" Detroits | Leather | Electric Seat | Sunroof | RNS510 | Dynaudio | Park Assist | RVC | MDI

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by backdoc View Post
    That's what I loved about the R32. It was amazing how much street cred (deserved or not) that thing attracted. I got so many guys coming up to me to talk about it. Especially when it was reviewed on Top Gear and whooped the 130i.

    I have to say though, I don't reckon the R looks that different to the GTI. Exhausts and that's it. The silver snout of the R32 at least helped a bit. The Ford Focus RS is so obviously not Nana's car, but the GTI and R just look almost too much like Sleepers. I hope my driving will give it away
    The Sleeper look is fine by me. If I wanted big bonnet scoops and rear wings, then i'd be looking at the Mitsu/Subaru/Mazda cars, but none of them appeal to me.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    323
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Glennb View Post
    The Sleeper look is fine by me. If I wanted big bonnet scoops and rear wings, then i'd be looking at the Mitsu/Subaru/Mazda cars, but none of them appeal to me.
    No they are ugly, but I mean it could look a little tougher.........couldn't it?

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by MurphyTheElf View Post
    When a FWD car experiences uneven grip on takeoff, it's going to scuttle sideways a little, simple as that. Fancy electronic trickery just reduces it.
    That's not torque steer, that's uneven grip. Rear wheel drive cars also suffer from that issue, albeit it with differing effects, when they're accelerating with uneven grip between wheels the left rear and right rear wheels.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    400

    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    That's not torque steer, that's uneven grip. Rear wheel drive cars also suffer from that issue, albeit it with differing effects, when they're accelerating with uneven grip between wheels the left rear and right rear wheels.
    OK, so it may not necessarily be related to torque, but higher torque increases the chance of loss of grip, which exacerbates the effects. The end result is the same - lane divergence. AWD cars can still exhibit this effect, while RWD cars will fishtail slightly but generally stay in a straight line.
    GTI MKVI Candy White | 5 door | DSG | ACC | 18" Detroits | Leather | Electric Seat | Sunroof | RNS510 | Dynaudio | Park Assist | RVC | MDI

Page 9 of 26 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |