Support VWWC

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 61

Thread: Tuning the Golf 90 TSI - Whaddayareckon?

  1. #31

    OK - now released:

    Twincharger first!

    Good News TSI owners - It's now released!


    151kw (peak) 317nm (peak)

    More importantly we are gaining 77nm @ 3580rpm & 30kw @ 3820rpm!

    Price is $1800 incl GST & Installation for two programs switchable

    This month it's eligible for the sale so either less 10% = $1620

    Or - Pay $1800 & get all options loaded for free!


  2. #32
    Now for the 90kw 1.4 turbo only:

    Good News TSI 90 owners - It's now released!


    100kw (peak) & 238nm (peak)

    More importantly we are gaining 41nm @ 2560rpm & 16kw @ 6160rpm!

    Price is $1600 incl GST & Installation for two programs switchable

    This month it's eligible for the sale so either less 10% = $1440

    Or - Pay $1600 & get all options loaded for free!


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    738
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy_H View Post
    Now for the 90kw 1.4 turbo only:

    Good News TSI 90 owners - It's now released!


    100kw (peak) & 238nm (peak)

    More importantly we are gaining 41nm @ 2560rpm & 16kw @ 6160rpm!

    Price is $1600 incl GST & Installation for two programs switchable

    This month it's eligible for the sale so either less 10% = $1440

    Or - Pay $1600 & get all options loaded for free!


    Good gains on the twincharger, that bodes well for the new polo GTI (and scirocco 1.4 if it ever gets gets here)

    Looks like the turbo on the 90 is running out of puff very early.. Guessing it's really small in order to produce torque at low revs?

  4. #34
    Correct Phil,

    It's a really tiny turbo - But as an overall package, it makes good numbers!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    60
    Did you tune the 118TSI with a DSG? As I had gearbox issues on a brand new car, I am a little scared of actually putting more stress on the box itself. What is the box rated up too in terms of torque? Has there been reliability tests?

    Thanks
    Last edited by twotribez; 01-06-2009 at 01:18 PM.

  6. #36
    Yes, tested with the new 7 speed dry clutch DSG. Actually two of our three development cars are the new DSG.

    Tune is well within the figures handed out internally by VW / Audi so no issues there!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    69
    Isn't the limit for the 7sp box 250Nm? If so, are you not pushing it dramatically close to the limit at 238Nm everytime you hit the pedal and pass 2600-3600rpm in the twincharger?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,594
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocket View Post
    Isn't the limit for the 7sp box 250Nm? If so, are you not pushing it dramatically close to the limit at 238Nm everytime you hit the pedal and pass 2600-3600rpm in the twincharger?
    250Nm is a rating not a limit.
    eg: A crane might be rated at 1tonne but may have a higher limit/capacity engineered into it.

    I don't think it's a coincidence that the 7 speed has a rating of 250nm and the torqueiest engine it is mated with (In the Skoda Octavia 1.8TSI - 118kw/250nm) outputs 250Nm as well. I would guess that after a while, when the 7 speed has proven itself, they will fit it to a "bigger" engine & surprise, surpise, it will be re-rated to suit the higher torque.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  9. #39
    You forget about a 40 - 60 % buffer over the rating.

    The rating is something published by the sales dept. NOT the engineering dept.

    We know this because of testing done on different DSG boxes with upcoming stage 3 kit development!

    VW have been testing the 7 speed dry clutch (via their motorsport division) with figures exceeding 500nm in "stress test" applications.

    I suppose it comes down to believing the 250nm point or not!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    69

    Ahh fair enough. I am aware of the safety factors used in calculating these figures, just didn't think they were that large. With efficient mechanical design, you obviously try to make the product as light/lean as you can to meet the safety factored loading conditions. Just didn't think they would be that high on such a small/low rated box.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |