It could be smart enough to consider the yaw rate as well as the direction of travel vs front wheels.
Who wants to test ?
I remember reading about this trait in an Audi review many years back - guess it makes sense for it to be prevalent in a golf too. Probably because 1) the engineers never believed any of the advantages of left-foot braking, and 2) to help drivers who panic in an emergency stop and hit all the pedals trying to brace themselves
I'd think it would be when the steering input doesn't agree with the car's direction of travel - i.e. the same conditions for ESP to activate normally...
It could be smart enough to consider the yaw rate as well as the direction of travel vs front wheels.
Who wants to test ?
Yes it would be a perfect scenario for ESP to step in IF loss of traction causing a spin or terminal understeer was the result of this lack of concentration. Will not stop you from plowing into that oncomming car or tree though.
When did I claim to react quicker and more effectively than ESP champ??? If I was driving home in a storm/flood then I would leave my ESP switched on and I would also take care and be on full alert, does that satisfy your BS claim?
And if you want me to explain how I can brake 4 individual wheels your just being a smart ass so I would much prefer some one of your mentality does not respect my comment.
It's probably smarter than we think.
The ESP is using all the available systems:
ABS
TCS
EBD
EBC
EDL/XDS
We already know that the ABS these days measures the wheels individually and can adjust the braking rates of individual wheels (EDL/XDS, EBD and TPMS all use that information). Even by the late 90's the ESP systems already had Longitudinal and Lateral acceleration sensors, yaw rate sensors, steering angle sensors and wheel sensors.
I unfortunately don't have a ESP Self Study guide that relates to the MKV or MK6 - but I know from the self study guide on Dynamic Chassis Control that in addition to the ESP stuff I mentioned above, they are also using accelerometers on the body, and sensors on the suspension, all measured 1000 times per second, to then determine how much adjustment the hydraulic valves in the dampers need to keep the car level and stable etc (based on the "Comfort, Normal and Sport" profiles that the driver selects). So it would not surprise me at all if the modern ESP also had access to that information (i.e. what the "body" is doing in relation to the wheels and suspension) and also made decisions based on that. It would not surprise me at all if some of those sensors (or even separate dedicated accelerometers) were in use on all Golf's regardless of whether DCC was optioned.
Has anyone got a recent VAG ESP document?
So, you've admitted you wouldn't by the car because it didn't have switchable ESP:
...then ended the quote by saying previously the R would now allow you to drive it. Pretty easy step to take for me to conclude that you think you're better than the ESP, don't you think.
Lighten up girlfriend, it's Friday.
You are missing one important word, switchable. I am not against ESP just non switchable ESP. I leave my Esp on most of the time but when I
set out on a track day or a sunday run through some twistys I want to be given the option to switch off the fun police.. Thought I was clear on that... Um sister.
Now buy me a beer
Polish F1 ace Robert Kubica -v- Electronic Stability Control?
This season won't be the same without Kubica - Anything goes
Any thoughts?
Cheers
WJ
Kubica was competing in a motorsport event, to suggest that his injuries could have been avoided with ESP on his competition car (with its full roll cage) is akin to suggesting that MotoGP should run with training wheels on the bikes for driver safety.
The risk of injury through an accident is what you sign up for when competing in the top echelons of the sport.
--------------------------
Sorry... what does that have to do with ESP?
Bookmarks