Support VWWC

Page 37 of 56 FirstFirst ... 27353637383947 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 370 of 558

Thread: Mk6 Golf Acceleration & Performance Data

  1. #361
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    472
    Users Country Flag

    13.3'ish is about spot on for ~220kw @ fly and a dual clutch transmission with launch control. The Evo 10's with their SST boxes all do those low 13 (13.1-13.2) times from the factory.

    Those mph figures agree with that as well.

    You really need more like 105-110mph to start seeing solid/consistent high 12's.
    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

  2. #362
    I hate flywheel figures they're just so easily bent to make things look enormous.
    Zbeasts car is 168 atw with it's stage one tune . Your right with the mph but I reckon/would like to think he might just touch a 12 with 103 mph

  3. #363
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St Ives, NSW
    Posts
    171
    Users Country Flag
    If I could get the initial (possibly not good for longevity of the motor) tune loaded back on I reckon I might get into the 12's . I've been playing around trying to figure out how to get the 1.8 60' time and think I have it sorted. Did some launches in the wet on the weekend and managed to spin all 4 wheels briefly on one take off
    Golf R 5 door, DSG, EVOMS CAI, TXS DP, Recode Tune.

  4. #364
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    161
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by break View Post
    13.3'ish is about spot on for ~220kw @ fly and a dual clutch transmission with launch control. The Evo 10's with their SST boxes all do those low 13 (13.1-13.2) times from the factory.

    Those mph figures agree with that as well.

    You really need more like 105-110mph to start seeing solid/consistent high 12's.
    You're not the same guy as break from gunna/fastfours etc with the barina are you?

  5. #365
    Actually that tune would have been quite safe, there was only some slight fuel pressure drop starting to occur just as the car was really ramping up boost in the low/midrange area where the fuel pump can't deliver enough. The target AFR's matched the specified values all the way through on all runs . The quick fix would be to either drop boost in that region or run a leaner mixture there and indeed this is what some vendors will do without issue but I'd rather just get the hardware right so that its never going to be a problem no matter what you do.
    We can't make the stage one tunes too good otherwise it might no longer comply with international recognised staged tune guidelines and we can't have that can we.
    I predict a 12 though....soon

  6. #366
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    So does zbeasty have a downpipe or not? Cause you guys keep saying stage one, yet his sig still says he's got a downpipe, and thus he's stage two...

  7. #367
    Downpipe sadly made jack power difference at that level to be honest, quite dissappointing, as expected boost control was shyte but once corrected it was OK. Note that I say power was not improved not spool or temps and so on I could chek my logs on that though. Another car totally stock but a 6MT is making 10Kws more than this with but a more aggressive tune. does that qualify as a stage 1 ?? Call it whatever you like I say

    The dump in question on zbeasts will come off the car in the near future so it will be a stage 1 once again for a brief period
    Last edited by parso_rex; 23-03-2011 at 09:52 PM.

  8. #368
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    The off-the-shelf downpipes from name-brand manufacturers don't necessarily make large amounts of extra peak power on the golfs... it's about improving the spool, widening the power band etc. DP + a tune which accounts for the DP (Stage II) may only give an extra 5kw peak over software only (Stage I) etc

    In any case... I don't want to get into arguments etc. Just saying if there are hardware changes too, regardless of whether you feel they're making any difference to peak numbers, they should be disclosed.

  9. #369
    I know what you mean, thats cool and I agree but we could quite easily put the stock dump back on there and do the same. Apart from a boost control map alteration to counter the effects of the dumpipe on the wastegate, Zbeasts car runs our lowest spec R configuration tunewise . In its current guise could it be called a stage 2 minus perhaps ? I'm happy with that too

  10. #370
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St Ives, NSW
    Posts
    171
    Users Country Flag

    Yes a DP, which I have in my sig, but a much milder tune than others that are out there. Going on stages I'll be a 2+ by the time we're finished because I'll have to fit a HPFP to realise the full potential.

    I'm hanging to find out how Wooduck did tonight and if ferret went out to see how his full tune goes. I can see a shootout at WSID coming on.

    I refitted my EVOMS after removing it for testing the other week and I think I here compressor surge some times. The car sounds good with it on but don't want to damage anything for the sake of sounding good. I'm fairly sure its not the DV making the sound so will have to investigate further.
    Last edited by zbeasty; 23-03-2011 at 10:18 PM.
    Golf R 5 door, DSG, EVOMS CAI, TXS DP, Recode Tune.

Page 37 of 56 FirstFirst ... 27353637383947 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |