Page 17 of 56 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 558

Thread: Mk6 Golf Acceleration & Performance Data

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    534
    Users Country Flag

    Yeah, just another thing if we are posting 1/4 mile times can we please get the tyre pressure too
    Genuine VW Parts Importer | Navigation | Bluetooth |
    Repairs | Lighting | Coding | Programming |Cameras

  2. #162
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,333
    Users Country Flag
    Hey y'all.. So how did FAB and DaveR go?? Any times yet lads?
    2010 MY11 GOLF R - 5DR | DSG | RISING BLUE | DYNAUDIO + ACC + BLUETOOTH + 19s + RNS510 |

    2017 MY17 TIGUAN HIGHLINE - 5DR | DSG | PEARL BLACK | SUNROOF + DAP |

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,684
    In a word, disappointing.

    Exactly half tank of fuel, driver only (no passenger)

    Code:
    Run	Gtech	PerformanceBox
    1	5.25	5.6
    2	5.02	5.2
    3	5.36	5.7
    4	5.09	5.4
    Runs 2/4 being the return trip. Outside temp was around 18deg according to the MFD, didn't bother with any VCDS logging.

    I was told to expect ~4.9 for an APR Stage 1 tune with the PerformanceBox from the APR dealer who did the tune. As you can see, the car isn't near those figures. Only stock figures I can find are the claimed 5.7, don't have any of the aussie mags near me to confirm their results.

    And with LC, its pretty hard to get it wrong...
    Last edited by dave_r; 21-02-2011 at 11:03 AM.

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    3,591
    Quote Originally Posted by dave_r View Post
    Code:
    Run	Gtech	PerformanceBox
    1	5.25	5.6
    2	5.02	5.2
    3	5.36	5.7
    4	5.09	5.4
    Sorry to hear you're not seeing the numbers you'd like Dave. Still pretty decent - 5.2 is not hanging around, by any means, and it is three tenths better than what VW claims for the stocker. What was the ambient temperature for your runs?

    Interesting to see the difference between the Gtech and the PerformanceBox too (although not surprising). The former does actually delay the starting timer to give you the maximum benefit of perfect staging (great excuse for slow response, hehe), and its GPS chip is only 10Hz so there's a significant issue with accuracy there too. I've got one of the latest Gtechs, and I'm sure that my best run was at least a couple of tenths optimistic.

    One of the best ways to check how long the Gtech has taken to respond is to look at the detailed plot screen for the run, and see the speed and time for the first plot. If it says you're doing 10km/h inside of a tenth of a second, you know why the run under-read quite so much.
    2008 MkV Volkswagen Golf R32 DSG
    2005 MkV Volkswagen Golf 2.0 FSI Auto
    Sold: 2015 8V Audi S3 Sedan Manual
    Sold: 2010 MkVI Volkswagen Golf GTI DSG

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Is this Fab_R's older non-GPS GTech unit?

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    3,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    Is this Fab_R's older non-GPS GTech unit?
    Ah, if that's the case, then that does explain at least some of the discrepancy then.

    I've read somewhere that even the new Gtechs rely largely on the accelerometers to start the run timer - so, the same mechanism as the older Gtechs. Once you're on the run you can count on the new version being more accurate (accurate at least to 1/10th thanks to the 10Hz GPS). Checking the speed and time for the first plot point should give you the info you need to determine the approximate delay for the run start (if any).
    2008 MkV Volkswagen Golf R32 DSG
    2005 MkV Volkswagen Golf 2.0 FSI Auto
    Sold: 2015 8V Audi S3 Sedan Manual
    Sold: 2010 MkVI Volkswagen Golf GTI DSG

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    880
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamD View Post
    Sorry to hear you're not seeing the numbers you'd like Dave. Still pretty decent - 5.2 is not hanging around, by any means, and it is three tenths better than what VW claims for the stocker. What was the ambient temperature for your runs?

    Interesting to see the difference between the Gtech and the PerformanceBox too (although not surprising). The former does actually delay the starting timer to give you the maximum benefit of perfect staging (great excuse for slow response, hehe), and its GPS chip is only 10Hz so there's a significant issue with accuracy there too. I've got one of the latest Gtechs, and I'm sure that my best run was at least a couple of tenths optimistic.

    One of the best ways to check how long the Gtech has taken to respond is to look at the detailed plot screen for the run, and see the speed and time for the first plot. If it says you're doing 10km/h inside of a tenth of a second, you know why the run under-read quite so much.
    The thing that is wierd to me is the difference in the runs (Gtech -v- Vbox) - 2/10tenths to 4/10 tenths. Its not a consistant difference???!!!

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    50
    Has anyone done any quarter mile drag runs with a chipped R?

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Springwood
    Posts
    253
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Fab_R View Post
    The thing that is wierd to me is the difference in the runs (Gtech -v- Vbox) - 2/10tenths to 4/10 tenths. Its not a consistant difference???!!!
    Due to 10Hz resolution
    It could be that the lower reading is -0.1s and the higher reading is +0.1s (then vice versa in the next result)
    2010 Golf R - 3dr - Manual - Rising Blue - MDI - SatNav - Milltek TBE

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    880
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_Bob View Post
    Due to 10Hz resolution
    It could be that the lower reading is -0.1s and the higher reading is +0.1s (then vice versa in the next result)
    Hey Bob i dont follow?

Page 17 of 56 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |