Page 10 of 16 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 159

Thread: MK VI Wagon in OZ

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    151

    Quote Originally Posted by Spook View Post
    Looking at what you want, the Octavia has you pretty well covered.
    • DSG Liftback/wagon at $37,705 / $39,810 on road respectively
    • Front/rear sensors at $990
    • metallic paint at $630
    • MDI at $270 (?? - I used VW price)

    And you're all set. Assuming negligable stamp duty and total is $41,700 driveaway for the wagon without any haggling. You get acceleration 0-100km/h in 7.8 seconds, fuel consumption 6.7L/100km, dual zone air-con, auto headlights and wipers, multifunction leather steering wheel, 560/580 litres boot space, and the neatest touch-screen audio (and parking/climate control) system there is, the RCD510 (aka Bolero).

    SNIP

    So it looks like the Octavia wagon is pretty much lineball with the Golf wagon, which surprises me to be honest. I would have thought Skoda will be cheaper than their VW cousins. In any case, all this is pure conjecture until VW puts out the pricelist.
    Bigger boot, faster, possibly cheaper to buy, a bit more exy to run but services might be cheaper...its definitely lining up as my #2 choice.

    I need to drive it.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag
    MLC what part of Sydney are you in?

    Why would the Skoda be more expensive to run? The most expensive part is depreciation & the Skoda will be far worse than the Golf initially buit if you are on a 10 year ownership cycle then depreciation wont be an issue.

    Haven't got my receipts handy but servicing is similar dollars to the Golf. No big issue - every 15,000km/12 months, whatever is first. IIRC 15k was ~$250; 30k was ~$330.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    84
    Just a piece of info that may weigh into your decision making on the Golf Wagon (not sure if this has been stated), despite the MkVI look it is based on the MkV platform.
    Scirocco R | DSG | 19" Talladegas | Viper Green
    MkVI Golf 118TSI | 6spd Man | 17" Classixs | APR Stage I
    MkV Jetta 2.0 TFSI | DSG | 18" Charlestons | APR Stage II

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Who is messing with my profile?
    Posts
    466
    Quote Originally Posted by midlifecrisis View Post
    NZ exchange rate is $1NZ = $0.80 AUD So take 20% off everything.
    A little simple - you ignore the taxes on cars here, not comparable with NZ unfortunately.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by brad View Post
    MLC what part of Sydney are you in?
    NE of Parramatta.

    Why would the Skoda be more expensive to run? The most expensive part is depreciation & the Skoda will be far worse than the Golf initially buit if you are on a 10 year ownership cycle then depreciation wont be an issue.

    Haven't got my receipts handy but servicing is similar dollars to the Golf. No big issue - every 15,000km/12 months, whatever is first. IIRC 15k was ~$250; 30k was ~$330.
    I was thinking fuel consumption for a 1.8TSI and a heavier vehicle.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by KWICKS View Post
    A little simple - you ignore the taxes on cars here, not comparable with NZ unfortunately.
    Ok, fair cop.

    So 90kW TSI DSG Golf = $40,750NZ / 32,600AUD
    Aussie it is $28,490AUD so $4K less. Not Apples to Apples exactly (NZ has climatic aircon) but and interesting match. So I am guessing cheaper in Aus.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by tofo17 View Post
    Just a piece of info that may weigh into your decision making on the Golf Wagon (not sure if this has been stated), despite the MkVI look it is based on the MkV platform.
    Ok, do we know what difference in performance/handling/features this has?

  8. #98
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by midlifecrisis View Post
    NE of Parramatta.
    Oh... if you were down my way near Hurstville I would have offered you a drive.

    I was thinking fuel consumption for a 1.8TSI and a heavier vehicle.
    OIC. I don't really consider fuel to be a major expense. I do 25,000km a year and am avging 6.7L/100. At $1.25/L for 98ron it's $2100 a year for fuel (seems too cheap - /checks.... 2008 = $2052; 2009 = $1866 but I was OS for 4 weeks).

    I drive under near ideal conditions. Best tank ever was 6.1L/100; worst is 8.0L/100 twice - both the last week of December (08 & 09) when my wife was driving & lots of suburban work.

    A bigger engine doesn't necessarily mean significantly more fuel consumption. Bigger factors are where you drive & how much you flex the right foot.

    BTW: mine also uses a bit more fuel these days as it has been remapped to ~145kw & 350Nm. avg 6.5 before the remap, now 6.9 because I give it a bit.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    151
    Ok, one VW sales guy told a contact of mine today that Wagon is due April 2010 now...

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fremantle WA
    Posts
    69

    Maybe sooner

    Quote Originally Posted by midlifecrisis View Post
    Ok, one VW sales guy told a contact of mine today that Wagon is due April 2010 now...
    The main webpage states that the wagon is 'only a few short weeks away' which i think would mean a march launch so get in touch with your local dealer as they would almost certainly have the pricing.

    I must admit the Skoda (although initially my suggestion) would not make an attractive proposition if it is the same price or close. A skoda is great value when 4k cheaper with more features and by all accounts the media are reporting the VW wagon will start at sub 30k for the 1.4ltr, rumoured to be $27,990 in manual.

    I noticed Skoda have also added leather standard in some Passat models which also makes the Skoda around the same price in the Superb. It seems really illogical as i would think that most people spending this sort of money would rather go with the brand that is a success rather than take a punt on something that might work here in OZ

Page 10 of 16 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |