Originally Posted by
Dubya
Most would agree that the changes between Mark VI and V GTIs are nowhere near as significant as those between previous generations.
The main changes to the GTI in the Mark VI include:
XDL
Knee airbag
8% more power
Better radio head unit
Better fuel economy (~-0.4l/100km)
New twin exhaust
No door protector strips
No air vent on top of dash above radio unit
Additional options (notably ACC, rear view camera, park assist, 8-way power driver's seat)
(The list is more or less in order of how I would value each new feature personally.)
Otherwise, many of the changes seem to be change for changes sake, or at least stylistic rather than functional.
While the front of the Mark V GTI was markedly different from cooking versions of the Golf, the Mark VI is nowhere near as distinctive.
Gone is the deep grill and scooping bumper. The new bumper has a large number plate holder that may mean the small black Euro style NSW plate that looked so good on the front of the Mark V GTI will not fit as neatly - or can the plate holder be removed without leaving mounting holes exposed? If not, white Euro plates would probably be needed to properly fit the plate holder.
While I know new cars take time to get used to, I still think the Mark V is far better looking from the front.
The justification I've read for the new front, ie to invoke the first GTI, seems lame. Could it be that the distinctive grill of the Mark V GTI and GTs was encroaching too much on Audi's image? Or was it the lower production costs of a common bumper across the range that drove the change?
The new front perhaps is the single most (if not only) disappointing part of the new GTI.
The rear of the new Golf is definitely smarter, the painted lower bumper looking much better, as do the tail lights, I think. No question the new twin exhausts are an improvement too.
But other changes appear to be mainly for the sake of change, such as those to the sunroof control knob which has gone from being a neatly recessed knob to one that protrudes quite a bit. The mono instrument binnacle is replaced by one that houses two individual and more sporty binnacles for tacho and speedo within each dial of which is housed a temperature or fuel gauge. LED colour of the info display is now white instead of red. The steering wheel has changed (improved?). As has the location of the driver's power window controls slightly (but centre console mounting is always more practical, I think).
Apart from the list of functional/equipment changes above, can anyone suggest what other significant changes there are on the Mark VI and what else makes it a better package overall and worth moving to from a young Mark V?
The investment allowance available until the end of this year aside, I'm struggling to find a compelling reason to upgrade.
Bookmarks