Support VWWC

Page 84 of 291 FirstFirst ... 3474828384858694134184 ... LastLast
Results 831 to 840 of 2906

Thread: Golf R -v- Golf GTI

  1. #831
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Vic
    Posts
    232
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    I think maybe you're getting confused with some of the Golf R manual times or something like that?
    A Golf R DSG with only a Stage 1 ECU does 0 to 100 in ~4.68
    This has now been verified by multiple sources.

    In the Motor Hot Tuner Challenge a Ford XR6T with with $18,379 of modifications (ECU, Intercooler, Exhaust, Suspension, Brakes, Wheels, Tyres, Short shifter, and Injectors) only managed 4.95.

    What about a $88k Harrop Engineering (Supercharged) Commodore SS-V? 4.75
    What about a $88k BTA Motorsports Tuned FPV F6 (in the $20k of mods)? 4.61
    Or the winner in the Aussie segment, a $90k Walkinshaw Performance SS-V Sportswagen (inc $30k of mods). 4.50 seconds.


    So yeah... what happens if you DID only spend $1,500 (the cost of the APR Stage I R ECU) on those cars instead of the $20k to 30k they did to get those times? Well, clearly, they'd be seeing the back of your R as it left them behind
    Yep pretty damning figures in favour of the R there. Sorry but the only people dreaming are those that think they can pull sub 4.68 sec 0-100 times out of a Falcodore without spending VASTLY more cash on mods than what is needed on the R.

    THE BEAST: "2015 Lapiz Blue Wolfsburg Golf R wagon"

  2. #832
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    738
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    I think maybe you're getting confused with some of the Golf R manual times or something like that?
    A Golf R DSG with only a Stage 1 ECU does 0 to 100 in ~4.68
    This has now been verified by multiple sources.

    In the Motor Hot Tuner Challenge a Ford XR6T with with $18,379 of modifications (ECU, Intercooler, Exhaust, Suspension, Brakes, Wheels, Tyres, Short shifter, and Injectors) only managed 4.95.

    What about a $88k Harrop Engineering (Supercharged) Commodore SS-V? 4.75
    What about a $88k BTA Motorsports Tuned FPV F6 (in the $20k of mods)? 4.61
    Or the winner in the Aussie segment, a $90k Walkinshaw Performance SS-V Sportswagen (inc $30k of mods). 4.50 seconds.


    So yeah... what happens if you DID only spend $1,500 (the cost of the APR Stage I R ECU) on those cars instead of the $20k to 30k they did to get those times? Well, clearly, they'd be seeing the back of your R as it left them behind
    What was the APR Golf R 0-100 time in that test?

  3. #833
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    712
    Users Country Flag
    We should rename this thread Golf R vs Anything on 4 Wheels and we'd still probably win.
    MY11 Golf R - Rising Blue - 5DR - DSG - 19" Black OZ Ultralegerra - Leather - Sunroof - MDI - Euro Plates - Milltek Exhaust - Bluefin - SOLD
    MY11 Tiguan 147 TSI - DSG - Pepper Grey - Black Leather - RVC - MDI - BT

  4. #834
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    738
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Prodigy View Post
    We should rename this thread Golf R vs Anything on 4 Wheels and we'd still probably win.
    But that would count out turbocharged hayabusa's... which the golf R would clearly flog in the 0-100 benchmark...

  5. #835
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by philthy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    I think maybe you're getting confused with some of the Golf R manual times or something like that?
    A Golf R DSG with only a Stage 1 ECU does 0 to 100 in ~4.68
    This has now been verified by multiple sources.

    In the Motor Hot Tuner Challenge a Ford XR6T with with $18,379 of modifications (ECU, Intercooler, Exhaust, Suspension, Brakes, Wheels, Tyres, Short shifter, and Injectors) only managed 4.95.

    What about a $88k Harrop Engineering (Supercharged) Commodore SS-V? 4.75
    What about a $88k BTA Motorsports Tuned FPV F6 (in the $20k of mods)? 4.61
    Or the winner in the Aussie segment, a $90k Walkinshaw Performance SS-V Sportswagen (inc $30k of mods). 4.50 seconds.


    So yeah... what happens if you DID only spend $1,500 (the cost of the APR Stage I R ECU) on those cars instead of the $20k to 30k they did to get those times? Well, clearly, they'd be seeing the back of your R as it left them behind
    What was the APR Golf R 0-100 time in that test?
    APR didn't have a DSG Golf R (or GTI) in the test.

  6. #836
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Springwood
    Posts
    253
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamD View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SilvrFoxX View Post
    I thought the NRMA did a pretty good job in their comparison Volkswagen Golf R v Golf GTI comparison - NRMA Motoring & Services
    +1. That is a great article, and sums up the two cars quite well. About time a journo managed to balance out the qualities of the two models accurately!
    Nice general review,
    I'm a bit concerned that their GTI was rolling on 245/60R17s??
    that's similar to the Touareg...
    2010 Golf R - 3dr - Manual - Rising Blue - MDI - SatNav - Milltek TBE

  7. #837
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hills District, Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,448
    Users Country Flag
    I am more than happy to see the R out perform some sheet metal that is revered for its performance figures but I struggle with the idea that a $1500 spend can result in a better outcome than an $18K spend. Perhaps it is metric by which the comparison is being made.. 0-100 figures suggest a power to weight advantage held by the R.. what are the figures over the quarter mile..?

    As that would tell you which car would see the other in the rear view mirror
    Current Ride: MY 16 Daytona Pearl Grey Audi S3- Performance Pack 1, Sunroof and Driver assist

  8. #838
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_Bob View Post
    Nice general review,
    I'm a bit concerned that their GTI was rolling on 245/60R17s??
    that's similar to the Touareg...
    Yeah, that's a mistake. They have the correct tyres listed in the specifications at the bottom of the article though.

    I also noticed they said this:
    The front of the R sits around 15mm higher than the GTI. The R has 30mm more ground clearance than the GTI.
    This also seems to be a mistake.



    Quote Originally Posted by SilvrFoxX View Post
    what are the figures over the quarter mile..?
    Not sure if any Golf R DSG with Stage 1 owners have had a chance to go to a dragway yet. 0 to 100km/h you can measure with a Performance GPS product on country roads or private roads legally.

    Quarter Mile is different. The car would be up 180km/h mark meaning it cannot be done on public roads, and more than likely no one has a private road straight and long enough to also have room to slow down.

    But it truly is amazing the difference a Stage 1 ECU does make SilvrFoxX. I urge you to experience it yourself as soon as possible after receiving your car and breaking it in

  9. #839
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    738
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    APR didn't have a DSG Golf R (or GTI) in the test.
    I never said anything about a DSG. If they're so much faster why didn't Guy buy one?

    IIRC they had a manual with 30k spent on it which did 0-100 in 5.6 seconds or something (I haven't got the mag in front of me right now).

  10. #840
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hills District, Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,448
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Corey_R View Post
    Quarter Mile is different. The car would be up 180km/h mark meaning it cannot be done on public roads, and more than likely no one has a private road straight and long enough to also have room to slow down.

    But it truly is amazing the difference a Stage 1 ECU does make SilvrFoxX. I urge you to experience it yourself as soon as possible after receiving your car and breaking it in
    That being the case it seems to have made the previous arguements about the abilities of the R over a Typhoon somewhat moot..

    I believe everyone when they talk to the experience of of a stage 1.. I think I will just enjoy it stock for a while to ensure it is all bed in properly and see how it goes down the track.. I fear that the smoothness of the DSG and its already amazing performance will get me into trouble.. a chip upgrade would potentailly make that more problematic
    Current Ride: MY 16 Daytona Pearl Grey Audi S3- Performance Pack 1, Sunroof and Driver assist

Page 84 of 291 FirstFirst ... 3474828384858694134184 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |