data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4dc/ce4dc766328f3bc7b39f11f6b9d7236e8e52d989" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
Dubya
Drove an R (DSG) for the first time today. Bit of a beast.
Like most performance cars it's one that mostly rewards a decent jab of the throttle, without which, and around town, and when driven within its limits, as most cars are on the road, there's not sufficient difference between it and the GTI for mine. Didn't like the hesitation of the DSG from rest much either.
With an eye to more sustainable motoring, the GTI, weighing less, with 155kw and using just 7.2l/100 and providing at least an extra second or so of accelerative pleasure on the way to the legal speed limit is it for me . . . and at ~$10k less too (as I am not keen on the larger wheels, PDC, tinting or Xenons).
Call me a wowser but I felt lucky enough when Mrs Dubya canned the GT diesel we had on order (too neck snapping when the turbo cut in) and opted for the GTI - the R would just be a bridge too far! And it really is hard to get the benefit of these higher performance cars on the mostly city roads on which I drive with their relatively low and zealously enforced speed limits.
While I do like the idea of AWD, the weight penalty does impact performance and overall efficiency, especially around town where one is often taking off from rest.
Bookmarks