The point is, with GTI and R both running a 2l turbo engine, vw have to differentiate between the 2 cars. Hence the gti might got a "new" engine, it is not a better engine than what is in the R (new or old). Eg. gti runs k03 turbo and R runs k04 turbo. IF vw decided to continue with the r32, maybe gti mk6 would of got the better k04 turbo instead of the k03?
I was trying to keep it short. What i meant was having 2 tvs, 1 better than the other side by side. You can tell the difference on the rack but when you take it home there is nothing to compare it with, and the not as good one in reality is still pretty good.
Anyways, at the end of the day, it all depends on the budget one have. But if the issue of 5-10k is not a big one, i'm sure alot of people would go for the R.
IMO i didn't think the gti was that good of a car to start off with, they could of improved alot but they didn't because the R is running a 2l engine as well.
I believe they think they have.. the differenciation is not just the engine.. how does this perspective hold water .. Subaru have been running the WRX and The STI for years.. and the engines are the same size.. the reality is running gear is stronger in all aspects in reality the VW offering is far more differenciated .. I dont know that much about the EVO offering but it is also along the same lines
Current Ride: MY 16 Daytona Pearl Grey Audi S3- Performance Pack 1, Sunroof and Driver assist
but the mk6 gti does have a new engine and the golf r has an old engine.....
84 MK1 GTI
01 DC2R
New doesn't mean "better" either.
I mean, the best TV's every made are from 3 years ago, the last generation of Pioneer Kuro. NO manfacturer has made a TV as good since.
New isn't always better!
Bookmarks