Page 30 of 58 FirstFirst ... 20282930313240 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 573

Thread: golf R

  1. #291
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by KWICKS View Post
    Certainly not $90K
    Yeah. You'd have to go pyscho with options to hit $90k, although it would be possible.

    Just a word of note, corporate discount is usually not available in the 1st twelve months. Sharkie has also commented on this based on his experience of purchasing many VW models

  2. #292
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Who is messing with my profile?
    Posts
    466
    I'd usually not buy a new car in the first 12 months anyway (unless its a Holden which they revise every 6 months but then I wouldn't be buying one anyway ATM) just to let bugs be ironed out and also to let discountng begin. I'm not by nature an early adopter.

  3. #293
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    sunshine coast
    Posts
    1,194
    i know they were posted a while ago but honestly why are people winging at the specs? yes stock standard are a lil underwhelming. but seriously guys this is an s3 2.0T engine which everyone knows if its chipped can produce 322hp with a chip alone.

  4. #294
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by mikepologti View Post
    i know they were posted a while ago but honestly why are people winging at the specs? yes stock standard are a lil underwhelming. but seriously guys this is an s3 2.0T engine which everyone knows if its chipped can produce 322hp with a chip alone.
    I think the people who were whinging at the specs were mainly over the 'incorrect 0 to 100 times' which were originally stated as 6.4 seconds or something. It would've been slower than the R32. But fairly quickly VW put out the official press release which stated 5.5 seconds. However, as is typical on the internet, many people didn't bother to look at anything official and keep commenting based on incorrect information

  5. #295
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    240
    Users Country Flag

    Twincharger for R

    Just noticed on the german website the R motor is twincharged same as 118TSI?

    http://www.volkswagen.de/vwcms/maste...tail.0.10.html

  6. #296
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    R20T with a Stage 3 kit from APR would be a weapon.
    I hope Sharkie goes with that as an option.

    Whilst everyone is complaining about stock figures, how many people buy a track spec'd 2L 4Cyl Turbo and leave it stock???

    Just go on carsales and see if you can find a stock Nissan Silvia or Subaru Imprezza.
    Jeez, it can even be pushed out to supra and commodore owners.
    It is nigh impossible because most people will buy their track-spec car for future upgrades to reach it's potential.

  7. #297
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by rosslm View Post
    Just noticed on the german website the R motor is twincharged same as 118TSI?

    http://www.volkswagen.de/vwcms/maste...tail.0.10.html
    It isn't twincharged.
    It is only running a single turbo.
    It was shown at the Frankfurt motorshow and it runs the same engine as the S3.

    It wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last time that a car company gets specs and details wrong about their own product.
    Last edited by team_v; 14-10-2009 at 08:10 AM.

  8. #298
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,194
    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    It isn't twincharged.
    It is only running a single turbo.
    It was shown at the Frankfurt motorshow and it runs the same engine as the S3.

    It wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last time that a car company gets specs and details wrong about their own product.
    e.g. My Tiguan booklet shows the front half of the roof lifting up and sliding back over the rear half for the sunroof and claims it as the panoramic sunroof............
    Probably another example of the confusion caused by VAG changing the designation of what was formerly known as TFSI to TSI which formerly stood only for twincharger. I was informed by a service advisor that the Jetta 2.0TSI loan car I had been driving was a twincharger (which of course it wasn't), looks like even the Germans don't understand their own terminology!

    Cheers

    George
    06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
    09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
    14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!

  9. #299
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Point Cook, Vic
    Posts
    5,191
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    It isn't twincharged.
    It is only running a single turbo.
    It was shown at the Frankfurt motorshow and it runs the same engine as the S3.

    It wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last time that a car company gets specs and details wrong about their own product.

    Its just silly how VW are playing around with the TSI designation.
    I remember looking at the pics from the frankfurt motorshow. Looking under the bonnet it clearly looks to be an FSI/S3 family engine with the airbox built into the engine cover and the remote DV. But did you see the engine cover? It has TSI written on it in nice shiney lettering! Way to go VW for confusing the issue!

    PERFORMANCE, STYLING AND OEM PRODUCTS FOR YOUR VW

    FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

  10. #300
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Liverpool NSW
    Posts
    138

    are you sure you guys areN't getting confused with TFSI?
    ~\\VoLkS//~\\MaN//~

Page 30 of 58 FirstFirst ... 20282930313240 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |