And if they ever put a straight supercharged motor (a la Audi's latest V6) into a Golf, then it will probably also have a TSI badge, just to keep the marketing boffins happy ;)
Printable View
Yeah i know remember my apprentice still works at PCB;-)
Bags me shot in your R20T mate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheers
Jmac
The letters F, T, S and I have specific meanings. I have explained them in this thread. The 1.4 GT has a turbo motor. The supercharger is like the first turbo in a twin turbo and only for reducing turbo lag and helping an earlier spool up. It is a "twin charger" system. If a VW had a supercharger and no turbocharger, it wouldn't get the T. VW don't flippantly throw letters and numbers together like bimmer does. They are intended to inform the buyer of which technologies the vehicles possess. Knowing what a boffin is might help one's fear of acronyms.
Your faith in the accuracy and integrity of the VW organisation is both admirable and heart warming, unfortunately the empirical evidence tells a different story :(
Until recently VW was using the TSI acronym only on the 1.4 GT engine (the "twincharger" one with with both a turbo and a supercharger), and TFSI for the 2.0 petrol engine with a turbo. These days both engines get the TSI acronym (as does the new cam chain driven version of the 2.0 turbo petrol).
For another example, look at the usage of the words "Bluetec", "BlueMotion" and "Adblue" in association with VW models being marketed as having superior fuel economy and/or emissions control).
Sorry, not always (don't you just hate those annoying exceptions to the "rules" ) - the "VW Touareg V6 TSI Hybrid" - has, wait for it..... a supercharged V6 (and, unfortunately for your theory, nary a Turbo to be seen).Quote:
If a VW had a supercharger and no turbocharger, it wouldn't get the T.
And just to be different, it seems Audi are marketing their version of the 3.0 V6 supercharged (ie no turbo) engine under the "TFSI" banner.
So until I see convincing evidence to the contrary, you can see why I will continue to hold the opinion that (unfortunately) those pesky marketing boffins have more say in this matter than the engineers and engine designers at VW.
Fair enough. Your point is valid. It does seem that the VW marketing division has decided to cash in on the cliche of TFSI. They still have throttle-plated manifolds and are charged by a compressor rather than a roller so it is still describing the vehicle's tech. VW own Audi, Porsche, Lamborghini and the off shoots (as I'm sure you are aware) so in these difficult times of reduced new vehicle sales, marketing needs to squeeze their past success for every ounce it's worth.
SI makes a cool noise with an airpod!
Yeah, I also believe R20T will be quicker than S3 ... both manual or DSG.
VW developed launch control in response to the embarrassement at the drag day ...... which improved things immensely but still don't match a properly driven manual on the strip. I'll find the link and post up.
However, you can't go around and use launch control every time you stop at a set of lights so the hesitation will still be there .... :frown: ... Some say you get used to it .... I won't though.
EDIT: found the link .... http://www.motoring.co.za/index.php?...icleId=2470517
So, what badges can we expect to see on these new Golf GTIs with extra go-power ?
I'm guessing "GTI-R" for the awd S3-alike, and maybe "Golf RS" for the super duper twin turbo insane one (in the unlikely event that VW actually do make them, and the even less likely event that they actually sell them here in Oz).
I can't see the marketing bods being keen on an "R20" as identifying the replacement for the current "R32".
I personally still have my doubts as to whether either will actually be sold in Oz, as they would be too close to Audi S3s and RS3s in performance and handling, but at a signficantly lower price.