Page 12 of 58 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 573

Thread: golf R

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    130

    Quote Originally Posted by hokenmk3 View Post
    ... I don't know what the S and I actually stand for ...
    Stratified Injection perhaps, as opposed to the more common port (homogeneous) injection.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wagga Wagga
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by idaho View Post
    Stratified Injection perhaps, as opposed to the more common port (homogeneous) injection.
    Yeah! That makes good sense! It rings a bells too. I think I've heard Fuel Stratafied Injection somewhere before. That might be what the F stands for too!
    Last edited by hokenmk3; 15-04-2009 at 10:01 PM. Reason: remove ambiguity - correct spelling
    My NA 2.0L 8v Mk3 Golf is faster than my 174kw twin turbo Supra. V8 utes and over modified Skylines hate being overtaken by old Golfs

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Who is messing with my profile?
    Posts
    466
    I thought FSI was Fuel Stoichiometric Injection.

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Sharkie View Post
    Slight performance increase ????? Mate, it should be a huge performance increase .... MK5 GTI 0-100km/h 7s (averaged DSG & man) R20T 0-100km.h 5.7s (using S3 figures which is less powerful)

    And I agree Mk3 is better looking than Mk5
    plus S3 figures is based on manual...so you can safely say DSG will be quicker too...

  5. #115
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by limmy View Post
    plus S3 figures is based on manual...so you can safely say DSG will be quicker too...
    I'm not sure it will be. When the DSG first came out all the specs said it was quicker, better fuel consumption, lower CO2 etc. But now for the MK6 the DSG offers only the same or slightly worse acceleration, worse fuel consumption and worse CO2.

    The UK specs for the GTI for example are:
    6.9sec 0-62mph, 7.3 L/100km, 170g/km
    6.9sec 0-62mph, 7.4 L/100km, 173g/km

  6. #116
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wagga Wagga
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by KWICKS View Post
    I thought FSI was Fuel Stoichiometric Injection.
    I googled it and it is Fuel Stratified Injection but it was called Fuel Stoichiometric Injection in The Netherlands when it was first released there as not to be confused with something Mitsubishi was marketing at the time.

    Stratified means ranked or graded into the area of distribution.

    Stoichiometric means the correct ratio between 2 chemicals.

    what enlightening fun!
    My NA 2.0L 8v Mk3 Golf is faster than my 174kw twin turbo Supra. V8 utes and over modified Skylines hate being overtaken by old Golfs

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,875
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by limmy View Post
    plus S3 figures is based on manual...so you can safely say DSG will be quicker too...
    Not necessarily..... VW have always made big performance noises about DSG being quicker than a manual. And it does change gears quicker than a manual and in VW's tests .... starting the clock when the car starts moving it has been quicker ....

    HOWEVER when VW took the press to a drag strip to "prove" their claims the manuals beat the DSGs over the qrtr every single time ........ (I can provide a link to the press report on this)

    That bit of lag (and the press still reports on this in every test and I experienced it on a recent testdrive of the Q5) of a DSG upon pull-off when the lights turn green means the manual is gone ......

    SO timed against the clock from when movement starts ... yes a DSG is quicker

    BUT timed on a drag strip, the manuals still beat the DSGs .... PROVIDED the driver knows what he is doing as the DSG allows even tools to shift quickly

    Either way, I'm comfortable that the R20T/whatever will do it in a time around 5.7s ... ... and that is before I let the tuners near it .....
    Current: 2023 MY23 T-Roc R Lapiz Blue + Beats Audio + Black pack 2018 MY19 Golf R manual Lapiz Blue + DAP) 2018 MY18 Golf 110TSI (150TSI) Trendline manual White2014 Amarok TSI Red (tuned over 200kw + lots of extras) 2013 Up! manual Red 2017 Polo GTI manual Black Previous VWs and some others ...

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Five Dock, Sydney
    Posts
    947

    More R20/R45(!) rumours

    has anybody thought of VW using Audi's 2.5L turbo??

    Heres that latest rumour
    '03 Bora V6 4motion ~ CC Flash ~ Neuspeed F&R ARB ~ .:R optioned - Bilsteins,Springs,shifter,steering ~ Tyrol Brake kit ~ EVOMS CAI

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Liverpool, Sydney
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by goodfella View Post
    has anybody thought of VW using Audi's 2.5L turbo??

    Heres that latest rumour
    WoooooooooooooooooooooooooW!
    BLACK 2.0 FSI Jetta -
    Transforms - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgjFFxjkZlQ

  10. #120
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,207

    FSI = Direct Injection normally aspirated.

    TSI = the new range of turbo, turbo+supercharged engines.

Page 12 of 58 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |