Quote Originally Posted by WhiteJames View Post
Very unlikely to replicate the official consumption levels in real world conditions. But trying to obtain a gauge on how much the R is likely to use over and above offical claims. The official claims of 21% less fuel usage of the R verses the R32 seems good on paper, but both driven in a similar way or same roads, I'd imagine the claimed saving of the Golf R would be much less so.
I would disagree with this too. Because then you're comparing 'real world' R fuel consumption to the 'Australia fuel consumption test claim' for the R32. If you compared the real world for both, the R possibly has greater than a 21% saving compared to the R32. Compare apples to apples my friend