Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Golf 77TDI announced

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    84

    Golf 77TDI announced

    Scirocco R | DSG | 19" Talladegas | Viper Green
    MkVI Golf 118TSI | 6spd Man | 17" Classixs | APR Stage I
    MkV Jetta 2.0 TFSI | DSG | 18" Charlestons | APR Stage II

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wodonga
    Posts
    45

    Thirsty little devil

    I must confess that I am surprised how thirsty (in a relative sense) the new 1.6TDI engine is. A claimed 4.9L/100km is more than 10% thirstier than similar sized and powered offerings from Peugeot and Citroen where 4.4L/100km is the norm. The slightly lighter Mini D using a version of the Peugeot/Citroen 1.6L diesel engine is claiming 3.9L/100km.
    Whilst new dubber 1.6TDI is not bad in an outright sense, it's hardly better than the much more powerful 2.0TDI.
    Not a real complaint given that it's a price leader (so to speak) but hardly the class leader one would expect of a new diesel engine.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    central coast. Lake Macquarie. (Not Port Macquarie.)
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by mtaoz3 View Post
    I must confess that I am surprised how thirsty (in a relative sense) the new 1.6TDI engine is. A claimed 4.9L/100km is more than 10% thirstier than similar sized and powered offerings from Peugeot and Citroen where 4.4L/100km is the norm. The slightly lighter Mini D using a version of the Peugeot/Citroen 1.6L diesel engine is claiming 3.9L/100km.
    Whilst new dubber 1.6TDI is not bad in an outright sense, it's hardly better than the much more powerful 2.0TDI.
    Not a real complaint given that it's a price leader (so to speak) but hardly the class leader one would expect of a new diesel engine.
    Yeah seems strange.
    From memory even the new Audi 1.9 A3 gets 3.9 L/100 but this is with 7 DSG and
    roll resisting tyres.
    I think they have out priced themselves again due to the larger fuel use
    compared to the cheaper and more fuel efficient Peugeot/citroen.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by neil View Post
    Yeah seems strange.
    From memory even the new Audi 1.9 A3 gets 3.9 L/100 but this is with 7 DSG and roll resisting tyres.
    I think they have out priced themselves again due to the larger fuel use
    compared to the cheaper and more fuel efficient Peugeot/citroen.
    Have to disagree fellas. Checking the Peugeot website shows that the most economical 308 (Golf competitor) diesel gets 4.7 combined which is very close to the Golf's 4.9. All the other 308 diesels have higher consumption. You're probably thinking of the 207?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    421
    Users Country Flag
    Interesting that they could just sneak in the dry clutch 7 speed DSG used on the petrol variants. I wonder if the output really is 250Nm or actually more... or whether they "detuned it" to make it fit within the 250Nm capacity limit of the gearbox.
    Skoda Octavia Mk3
    (sold) Golf Mark 6 Comfortline 118
    (sold) Golf Mark5 Comfortline Manual 2.0 FSI

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,207
    The 1.6TD only has a 5 speed manual. And lower power doesn't always mean lower consumption. It's just a was for VW to get a lower priced TD onto the market. Though, for the price most people would be better off getting the 90TSi and pocketing the money.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    36

    I got to drive one today as my service loan car, Its a nice drive , very basic interior . Engine is very quiet and is a sprightly as the 1.9 , loves to rev i'd be happy if i owned one

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |