Current ride: 2014 Range Rover Evoque 5 Door TD4 Pure | 9 Spd Auto | Fuji White | Black Leather | 19 inch 'Dynamic' Wheels
Previous rides: MY11.5 Golf GTI 5 door | DSG | Candy White | 18' Detriots | Bluetooth | K&N Air Filter | Dancing Dials (Oh Yeah!)
| 1989 Porsche 944S2 Coupe| Guards Red| Leather| Sunroof| LSD
Nov '15 Polo 81TSI manual white
Anyone thinking of taking an extended warranty should read this article. Lemon laws protect you | carsguide.com.au
MY 12 Golf GTI
I read the article, and apart from a line about dealers not being allowed to pressure you into buying an extended warranty, I'm not really sure of the relation of anti-lemon laws and extended warranties. If the car has survived 3 years, it's surely well past the stage of being "a lemon"
Anyone considering not getting the extended warranty because of the ACL should have their heads examined. Australia has a long history of creating consumer laws but not enforcing them, anyone who has ever dealt with the ACCC or state based departments like fair trading will know what I'm talking about. It's all very well to have these laws but when the only way to enforce them is through the courts very few people will bother due to the costs involved and especially when a major failure for example is not defined.
Take a look at one of the examples they give
LEMON #1
MR X had a few problems, over eight months, with his new 2001 model Falcon ute -- two failed motors, two failed clutches, one failed gearbox, engine noise and shock absorber woes.
A lemon? Not according to the NSW Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal which, despite finding that Mr X's ute was not of merchantable quality, was ``satisfied that neither the dealer nor the manufacturer was aware of the defects before the sale of the car''.
It also found the dealer ``had rectified all identified defects and, although the manufacturer took six months to identify the systemic problem, it did honour its warranty by providing replacement parts''. Mr X's claim for a refund or replacement was dismissed.
Last edited by Maverick; 04-07-2011 at 11:07 PM.
website: www.my-gti.com
Volkswagen have sold over TWO MILLION DSG boxes so of course there will be some with problems. The 6 speed box has been around since ~2002 and is bulletproof, there are problems with the mechatronics at times with solenoids but there are no widespread failures of them. Half or more of the problems posted are because the owner CBF RTFM and they don't understand that the DSG is NOT an automatic transmission and it doesn't have a torque converter.
website: www.my-gti.com
Would the DSG need a different way of driving vs a torque converter based car?
We've driven the V GTI for years now either in auto mode where it behaves like a torque converter auto or in manual mode but can't say I have treated it differently.
If anything, I suspect my familiarity with the DSG in manual mode caused me to take the same liberties such as downshifting to perform an engine brake in my other small runabout that might have contributed to an early demise of the torque converter in that car
Ps what's CBF?
website: www.my-gti.com
I'm very thankful for the standard hill start feature on the VI 77TSi which we didn't get on the V GTI![]()
Bookmarks