Page 4 of 120 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 1199

Thread: DSG: Problems, Questions, Likes and Dislikes

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59

    Talking DSG = I Love It..

    Quote Originally Posted by paulcito View Post
    Just wanted to start a thread for any DSG owners out there who wish to vent their likes/dislikes/frustration...
    My two bobs worth - I love the DSG.

    I drive a Golf 103TDI and find the turbo diesel kicks in beautifully and the gear changes, in both standard ("D") and sports ("S") mode, are very smooth, up and down. When I put my foot down, she just kicks down very nicely and takes off like a little rocket. My car has just over 15,000 km on the clock.

    Although I've only owned it a few weeks (i.e. was a dealer demo) I think the DSG is one of "the best" parts of my new car. One feature I like (so I read somewhere) is the ability for the transmission to automatically skip gears smoothly, so it can go from 6th to 2nd (when I slow down) very nicely and timed "just right".

    Just my opinion anyway!
    Last edited by Mk6 Golf; 07-03-2010 at 03:50 PM. Reason: typo
    VW

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,553
    Quote Originally Posted by G-rig View Post
    I agree with sharkie, If you are after the fastest 0-100 times get DSG and do the DSG hardware and software upgrades (not just a giac flash), just like the MK5 turbo R32 has done as featured in Motor Mag. Otherwise 6MT can handle a bit more punishment.
    Why get the DSG hardware and software upgrades when it's not required? It may be for higher output but we're only really talking clutches which can be done when the stock ones wear out but for stage 1,2 and even 3 it's not required on GTI's. There are heaps of high powered cars running stock DSG boxes without problems.

    I would stick to manual in small motor cars, just like you wouldn't get auto as you lose power.
    DSG gives better fuel economy, is faster, is easier in traffic and can be used in manual mode if required.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    64
    Users Country Flag
    Pardon my ignorance, but faster gear changes for the DSG is really only going to be useful for 'racing' purposes. For the majority of people, we are talking about normal everyday commuting and being able to change gears in an instant, is pretty much useless. When I look at a car, the only thing I am interested in (speed wise), is in-gear acceleration (for over-taking).

    That being said, the only benefit I can see of the DSG is that you don't have to physically change gears... and where's the fun in that?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by G-rig View Post
    I would stick to manual in small motor cars, just like you wouldn't get auto as you lose power.
    Who said you lose power due to a DSG?

    Quote Originally Posted by starionx View Post
    Pardon my ignorance, but faster gear changes for the DSG is really only going to be useful for 'racing' purposes. For the majority of people, we are talking about normal everyday commuting and being able to change gears in an instant, is pretty much useless. When I look at a car, the only thing I am interested in (speed wise), is in-gear acceleration (for over-taking).

    That being said, the only benefit I can see of the DSG is that you don't have to physically change gears... and where's the fun in that?
    You need to go drive one. The faster changes are amazing even in every day driving, because they make the drive so 'smooth' and power is for all intents and purposes 'smooth'.
    There are MANY advantages to the DSG. Basically take most of the advantages of a traditional manual, and most of the advantage of an auto, whack them together, and you have the DSG.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by starionx View Post
    Pardon my ignorance, but faster gear changes for the DSG is really only going to be useful for 'racing' purposes. For the majority of people, we are talking about normal everyday commuting and being able to change gears in an instant, is pretty much useless. When I look at a car, the only thing I am interested in (speed wise), is in-gear acceleration (for over-taking). That being said, the only benefit I can see of the DSG is that you don't have to physically change gears... and where's the fun in that?
    Have you driving a car with DSG transmission? I have and the experience is amazing, the acceleration is so smooth and (I feel) the DSG maximises the power to the wheel without having to manually use a clutch. Fast gear change is only one part of the DSG, IMO
    VW

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    64
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    You need to go drive one. The faster changes are amazing even in every day driving, because they make the drive so 'smooth' and power is for all intents and purposes 'smooth'.
    There are MANY advantages to the DSG. Basically take most of the advantages of a traditional manual, and most of the advantage of an auto, whack them together, and you have the DSG.
    I've only ever driven manuals. I work nights, so I don't drive in peak hour. I like changing gears. As for smoothness... meh... not a priority (I come from an RX-7 background). I am just trying to justify a $2-3000 extra expense for the DSG, and for me, I can't. To be honest, I currently drive a Mazda 6 mps (manual), and I love it... but I want a small hatch. I am looking at the GTI, but FWD doesn't thrill me (especially with all the ECU 'upgrades' available). I am waiting to see what 'flavours' the R20 comes in.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    Who said you lose power due to a DSG?
    I meant you wouldn't buy an auto with a small capacity engine like the old autos..

    DSG vs 6MT is all splitting hairs anyway, if you are in a heaps faster car it woudn't matter.
    Last edited by G-rig; 07-03-2010 at 04:38 PM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Oh, that makes sense G-rig.

    And at starionx - go drive a GTI with the 6sp DSG, then come back and have this conversation. You can't understand how good the GTI with its FWD and 6sp DSG is having come from a Mazda background. Different level of engineering quality there
    Last edited by Corey_R; 07-03-2010 at 04:53 PM.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gippsland Victoria
    Posts
    189

    Wink

    DSG for the most part brilliant, but in my experience there remains a "Dangerous" element to it in terms of hesitation on take off and uncertainty.Please don't tell me i don't drive the car properly.I am considering a chip mainly to alleviate this.I would never pull out and accelerate in all circumstances that i would not question doing, in previous cars.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618

    Quote Originally Posted by stormshark View Post
    DSG for the most part brilliant, but in my experience there remains a "Dangerous" element to it in terms of hesitation on take off and uncertainty.Please don't tell me i don't drive the car properly.I am considering a chip mainly to alleviate this.I would never pull out and accelerate in all circumstances that i would not question doing, in previous cars.
    That's true, my mate nearly got hit and the hesitation was an accident waiting to happen.

    Hopefully htey have sorted it out with the MK6.

Page 4 of 120 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |