Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Best fuel for Mk6 GTI?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Windsor, VIC
    Posts
    7

    Best fuel for Mk6 GTI?

    My dealer recommended the BP Ultimate (and another brand I can't remember). He personally recommended staying away from Shell (V-Power?).

    Any opinions on what is best?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    I prefer the BP premium. Have convinced myself previously that I could feel the difference (but could be wanting to feel it).

    I've seen a few threads on this, they all seem to say the same:
    http://www.vwwatercooled.org.au/newf...highlight=fuel

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Southside...
    Posts
    2,514
    Users Country Flag
    There have been stories on the occasional bad (read old) batch of V-Power causing issues with cars. As long as your local Shell tops up their supplies regularly you'll be fine.

    I prefer to stick to one brand but as you long as you stick to any of the major four and 98 RON you'll be fine.

    Also have a search, this topic has been discussed/argued since time began.

    Cheers,
    Trent

    2010 Renault Clio RenaultSPORT 200 Cup 20th Anniversary Edition - #19 of 30 - The French Connection...
    2004 Volkswagen Golf R32 MkIV - #044 of 200 - Gone But Not Forgotten...
    "Racing is life; Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen -=-=- "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Unknown

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    I saw an episode of 5th Gear once where they took the same Subaru WRX STI and ran it with various fuels, including BP Ultimate. It showed more power on the dyno and significantly better economy.

    I'm not sure whether the UK fuel relates to Australia, but there are enough people who say that their car runs smoother on it and have more economy in Australia that I'd tend to believe them.

    Shame they're not affiliated with a Supermarket.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    272
    Always makes me laugh when I read about one fuel being better than another, to be honest I think it has more to do with the Servo and supplier and the cleanliness and upkeep of the equipment that supplies the fuel for the most part.

    A quick story.

    Whilst posted up in Cairns with the Navy a few years back we were sitting around talking to the techo (fuel operators) that provide the diesel that the ships ran on, at the time a fuel tanker was along side (Mobil or Caltex cant remember exactly) anyway we happened to be there to witness all of the fuel trucks in Cairns from all servos (not just the branded one of the ship) rock up and take their fuel. Leason here was its not always the specific brand advertised in smaller points.

    Also as an exercise some engineering types that I served with undertook some testing on fuels to determine quality etc, and sourced standard unleaded and premium unleaded as it was at the time. They performed some tests bascially to assess the RON of each fuel and low and behold none of the fuels were as advertised. From memory, and this is going a while back, Caltex Premium was the worst, coming in around the low 90s, with their standard unleaded around mid to high 80s, mobil was slightly better whilst Shell was the closest to reported with around 95 for their 'premium' supply.

    Based on this it was easy to see why high performance Jap cars were rarely brought to Aus as the fuel wasnt up to scratch, it was a while ago, going on 7-8 years so I'm sure its all improved with V-Power etc.

    Personnally I use V-Power more for a convienience factor but its the fuel I have always used, and the local shell is a much newer and better presented station that the competitors.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Windsor, VIC
    Posts
    7
    Thread Starter
    Thanks for the answers!

    I was interested to see if people use and recommend 95 RON since VW specify that on the Mk6 rather than the 98 RON fuels that I believe the Mk5 required.

    (BTW - I did do a search before posting and couldn't find anything in the Mk6 forum for the GTI. Many of the other links seem to be in the Polo forums.)

    I might try out the BP Premium that noone recommended and see if I can notice any difference to the Ultimate.

    Cheers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Blackburn, VIC
    Posts
    71
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Burry View Post
    Thanks for the answers!

    I was interested to see if people use and recommend 95 RON since VW specify that on the Mk6 rather than the 98 RON fuels that I believe the Mk5 required.

    (BTW - I did do a search before posting and couldn't find anything in the Mk6 forum for the GTI. Many of the other links seem to be in the Polo forums.)

    I might try out the BP Premium that noone recommended and see if I can notice any difference to the Ultimate.

    Cheers.
    I've heard the same Burry - 95 RON can run in the MK6 cars, 98 will obviously give you better economy though....and I believe Shell's 98 is 91 or 95 with additive (whatever it may be called). BP & Mobil are the ones I've heard are top shelf - but I won't know until I get the car, and I don't know what the 'full tank' will be on delivery yet !
    Currently driving 2014 Jeep Cherokee - looking at the 2017 Tiguan 162TSI Highline (Habanero Orange) !

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,594
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Burry View Post
    My dealer recommended the BP Ultimate (and another brand I can't remember). He personally recommended staying away from Shell (V-Power?).

    Any opinions on what is best?
    I have the similar BZB engine in my car. Have done 37,000km and in order of preference it likes:
    • Shell V-Power
    • MObil Synergy 8000
    • Caltex Vortex98
    • BP Ultimate

    Shell is a stand out winner; Mobil a close 2nd; the other 2 about equal. But it runs fine on all 4 (none are bad fuels).

    edit: read your post #6. My car gets better fuel economy on 98, so I've only tried the (minimum recomended) 95 ron once or twice. The saving in cents is offset by the extra fuel used so it works out only about $50 over the 25,000km I drive every year.

    Not sure why every worries about the price of fuel in these cars - they are so economical that fuel is one of my lesser expenditures. Depreciation is about 300% worse.
    Last edited by brad; 23-01-2010 at 04:34 PM.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wantirna South, VIC
    Posts
    127
    i used to work in mobil when i was a student, i found the fuel produce more power than Shell, we all has the same feel, even now, but the fuel runs out quicker than Shell, and lots customer complained about Shell's unleaded, they told me its ****! my manager told me that because Mobil add more Octan than Shell, that's why feel more power! i use Shell more often just because i can have 4c off...
    2010 GTI 5 Dr., DSG, CSG, 18# Detroit, Sunroof, MDI, Bi-Xenon, Park Assist+RVC, Dyaudio System, Chrome Boot Trim

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,224

    I too used to work for ExxonMobil's Singapore refinery. Tankers from BP would also fill up at the refinery.

    A servo owner in Cairns many years back told me that he would buy petrol from whoever was the cheapest that week. He was a independent Caltex servo owner.

    So the difference you are experiencing may just be a placebo effect.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |